← Election Series · Down-ballot coverage · Arizona

No endorsement

The race

Casa Grande Union High School District #82, in Pinal County, elects two members of its Governing Board on November 3, 2026. The race is nonpartisan. Three candidates are running for the two seats — the Casa Grande Dispatch is covering the race as a three-part candidate series framed, in its own words, around "three candidates running for two seats."

The roster comes from the Dispatch's candidate series, corroborated by GoodParty.org's filing compilation. Pinal County published no official candidate list in a form we could retrieve, so we grade this roster as compilation-grade.

The candidates:

Steven Hayes — Incumbent. Hayes's current board term runs 2023 to 2026, and he is the board's president: district minutes through 2026 show "President Steve Hayes" calling Casa Grande Union board meetings to order, and on January 12, 2026, the board elected him president for the year. In April 2026 he presided over the board's approval of an interest-based-negotiations pay and benefits package that district leadership described as deliberately conservative in a year of lost state revenue and an estimated $40 million in facility needs. Spelling note: sources render his first name both "Steven" and "Stephen" (he is minuted as "Steve Hayes"); we use the roster spelling and flag the variant in the gaps below.

Micah Powell — Sitting member, appointed in 2026. Powell was appointed to the board in 2026 and already serves: district minutes from February 2026 onward list him as a member present and voting. He is therefore not an outsider to this board — voters are judging a partial appointed term, though no campaign platform or endorsements for Powell were retrieved in this pass.

Michael Packard — Challenger. Packard carries the one named endorsement in this race: the Pinal County Democratic Party's 2026 guide names Packard alone — its "Vote 1" instruction is an endorsement of Packard, not a seat count. No occupation, campaign platform, or governing record for Packard was retrieved in this pass.

Pros and cons

Hayes — Pros: Incumbent board president with a documented term; presided over a pay package the district itself framed as fiscally conservative under revenue pressure. Cons: No campaign platform for a new term was retrieved; a presidency is a record of process, not yet a stated agenda voters can price.

Powell — Pros: Already serving by appointment in 2026, so voters can weigh real board service rather than promises alone. Cons: Appointed, never yet elected; no platform or endorsements retrieved.

Packard — Pros: The only candidate in the race with a named organizational endorsement (Pinal County Democratic Party). Cons: That endorsement is the whole sourced record retrieved — no occupation, platform, or record to verify behind it, and a party-guide endorsement by itself is not a governing record.

Record gaps

OUR CALL

Our call: insufficient record — no endorsement.

What would earn one: verified candidate statements — from the Dispatch series or the candidates themselves — putting positions on budgets, the district's $40 million in facility needs, curriculum, and parental rights on the record, so a choice can rest on more than incumbency, an appointment, and one party-guide endorsement.

For the complete Election 2026 breakdown — every race, claim by claim — see the full coverage on our website.

Vote early. Research your candidates. Choose the best moderates, whatever their party — no extremism from either side. And encourage your friends and family to do the same.

Sources

Election result — November 4, 2026

Result pending. No verified call (Associated Press or official) as of November 4, 2026. This page will be updated when the race is called or certified. The original article above is unchanged.

AI-assisted article — but the sources are human, and the facts are very real.

← Full down-ballot enumeration