← Election Series · All house races

Our verdict

LiberalMind endorses Rhett Marques

Election Day is Tuesday, November 3, 2026, and voting is underway in Alabama. This is the whole race — the records, the claims, and what the sources actually show. Read the research, and decide which flaw you can live with.

The setup

Alabama's 2nd District is being decided on a map its own legislature drew — after two years of being decided on one a court drew. Rep. Shomari Figures (D), in his first term, won this seat in 2024 under a court-drawn map (Black voting-age population 48.7%) with a D+9.2 margin (FTP Elections Intelligence race page; Alabama Reflector, Aug 2026). For 2026 the district runs on the Alabama Legislature's 2023 map, after the U.S. Supreme Court on June 2, 2026 paused a lower-court order that had blocked it, in the wake of the Court's ruling weakening the Voting Rights Act (FTP; AP via SRN News, Aug 11, 2026). On the 2023 lines, the district's 2024 presidential vote flips from Harris +8.2 to Trump +14.3 (FTP).

A note on baselines, because compilers are still catching up: PollingSource's district page still prints a Partisan Voting Index of D+5 — the old court-map number. It is stale, and we do not use it. Wikipedia's 2026 ratings table prints R+7 for the new lines, and that attributed figure is the baseline this article uses.

Because the map fight resolved in June, Republicans chose their challenger late, in a winner-take-all special primary on August 11, 2026 (Alabama Reflector; Reuters, Aug 12, 2026). The winner is Rhett Marques, a state representative from Enterprise, endorsed by President Trump and Sen. Katie Britt (AP). Figures was the only Democratic candidate to qualify and was unopposed (AP). No independent or minor-party candidate was located in the sources pulled; the Alabama Secretary of State's certified list is the final word and our research did not retrieve it directly — we say so rather than assert a two-man ballot as certified fact.

All three major raters — Cook Political Report, Inside Elections, and Sabato's Crystal Ball — rate the race Lean Republican. Cook moved it there from Likely R on October 23, 2026, citing private polls showing the race "in a dead heat" in a district Trump would have won by 14 (Alabama Daily News, Oct 23, 2026). Private polls are not public evidence, so here is the public record, with its central caveat in the same breath: every public poll in this race is Democratic-sponsored. Tulchin Research for House Majority PAC (Aug 31): 47–47. A DCCC internal (Jul 30): 46–46. Impact Research, a Democratic firm (Jun 25): Marques 45, Figures 44. PollingSource's average of the three reads Marques +0.3; FTP's average of the identical three polls reads Marques +2.3 — the two compilations differ by two points on the same data, so we print both, named, and blend neither. What the record actually shows is three Democratic-sponsored ties in a district the president carried by 14 — an anomaly to report, not a tie to declare.

The money: Figures has raised $2,706,098 with $1,197,689 on hand (PollingSource; FTP's FEC-through-October-14 figures agree). Marques's figures conflict by date and we print them dated rather than pick one: FTP (FEC through Oct 14) shows $1.72M raised and $178.1K on hand; Alabama Daily News reported Figures entering October with $1.38M against Marques's $328,000 — an October 1 figure. Outside groups have spent $9.62 million (PollingSource IE block).

Shomari Figures (Democratic)

The record: Figures is a proven officeholder by the only test that counts — he holds the seat, won in 2024 from the court-drawn district, and has served since 2025 (FTP candidate page; AP). His campaign's core claim is that the new district remains winnable because "a large swath of his current district is also within the new boundary lines," and he is running on his first-term record (Alabama Daily News, Aug 2026). His line against Marques — "just another rubber stamp on the same policies that are making life more expensive" — is campaign rhetoric, and we label it as such (statement via AP, Aug 11, 2026). Our research did not pull his 2025–26 roll-call record, and we will not invent one; what is documented is a party-line Democratic incumbent with no sourced break with his party toward conservative values on this file.

Pros: An incumbent's organization and a large cash advantage; a district whose new lines still contain much of his current constituency; polling — all of it from his own side's sponsors — that shows him even.

Cons: The map he won on no longer exists, and the one that replaced it voted Trump +14.3. There is no documented break with his party in service — the Manchin exception requires one, and it is not here.

The flaw, plainly: Figures's flaw is the caucus and the map: a Democrat whose organizing vote supports his party's program, defending a seat drawn by a court that his own state's elected legislature — and now the Supreme Court — have superseded.

Rhett Marques (Republican)

The record: Marques is a proven state legislator — an Alabama state representative from Enterprise since 2018 and the owner of a tire and automotive service business (AP via SRN News, Aug 11, 2026). He won a six-candidate, winner-take-all special primary with about 50% of the vote; the field included Hampton Harris (20.4%) and former Trump USDA appointee David Matthews (18.2%) (Alabama Reflector). He carries the endorsements of President Trump and Sen. Katie Britt (AP; Reuters). Our research did not pull his state-house voting record in this pass, and we print that gap openly: his Montgomery record is checkable, it is the record voters should weigh, and this article's endorsement rests on his eight years of in-party service and alignment rather than on a vote-by-vote audit we have not done.

Pros: Eight years of elected service in the state legislature — proven, not a first-timer; a small-business owner's biography in a working district; the president's and the state's senior senator's endorsements; a map that finally matches the district's actual politics.

Cons: Half of his own party's special-primary electorate chose someone else, in a compressed August race few voters watched. His cash position trails the incumbent's badly. And a state-house record unexamined in our research is a record readers should pull before treating this endorsement as audited.

The flaw, plainly: Marques's flaw is an unexamined signature record — the votes exist, they are his, and neither his campaign's summary nor our research pass has put them in front of voters yet. That is a diligence gap we name, not a demerit we invent: nothing located in this file contradicts his alignment, and under our rules an unexamined record is priced as exactly that — unexamined.

OUR CALL

LiberalMind endorses Rhett Marques.

The geometry is the doctrine's standard one. The Democrat is a party-line incumbent with no documented break toward our values, holding a seat only because a court drew it for him; the legislature's map — upheld through the Supreme Court's June order — restored the district its voters actually live in. The Republican is a proven eight-year state legislator aligned with the conservative program, endorsed by the president and by Sen. Katie Britt. In the House, where a Democrat's organizing vote is a lighter weight than in the Senate but still a vote for the other side's gavel, we do not leave a Trump +14 district with the party-line incumbent because his challenger's file is thinner than we'd like. We endorse Marques, and we print the diligence gap with the endorsement: his state-house votes are the first thing this coverage will audit as this article is updated.

This race is one of hundreds in LiberalMind's Election 2026 coverage. For the complete breakdown — every race, claim by claim — go to liberalmindhq.com.

Vote early. Research your candidates. Choose the best moderates, whatever their party — no extremism from either side. And encourage your friends and family to do the same.

Sources

Election result — November 4, 2026

Winner: Shomari C. Figures (Democratic) — called by the Associated Press. This result was appended on November 4, 2026 (results wave 1); the original article above is unchanged, exactly as published before Election Day.

AI-assisted article — but the sources are human, and the facts are very real.

← Back to the Election Series