← Election Series · All house races
Election Day is Tuesday, November 3, 2026, and voting is underway in Arizona. This is the whole race — the records, the claims, and what the sources actually show. Read the research, and decide which flaw you can live with.
The setup Rep. Paul Gosar (R), in the House since 2011, seeks re-election in a district Cook prices at CPVI R+15. Registration (SOS-compiled guide): Republican 44.30%, Democratic 20.44%, Other 35.26%. He was unopposed in the Republican primary, as was his Democratic challenger in hers (primary-guide compilation; Center Square). The confirmed printed ballot is two candidates (SOS-compiled guide, the Arizona Republic, and VOTE411): Paul Gosar (R) and Danielle "Dani" Sterbinsky (D). A conflict on additional candidates, printed as unresolved: FOX 10 Phoenix's CD-9 explainer (Oct. 2026) also lists Independent G. Seville Hatch and Independent William Perry as running. Neither appears in the SOS-compiled guide, the Republic's account, or Wikipedia's lists; Hatch is a known frequent write-in candidate in Arizona races (Politics1 lists him as a write-in in the 2025 AZ-07 special). We therefore print Gosar vs. Sterbinsky as the confirmed ballot and Hatch / Perry as FOX 10-only — most plausibly certified write-ins, unresolved pending the Secretary of State's certified list. A term-count note, flagged rather than resolved: the Republic (Feb. 21, 2025) described this run as seeking an "8th House term," while the Center Square (Oct. 2026) says "ninth term." Elected in 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, and 2024 is eight elections — a ninth-term bid is the arithmetic-consistent reading; the Republic's phrasing is preserved here as a minor source conflict. Sourcing strength is compilation-level: the SOS-compiled guide cross-checked against the Republic, the Center Square, and FOX 10.
Paul Gosar (R) The record: Gosar has served in the House since Jan. 2011 — first from a predecessor district, in AZ-09 since the post-2020 map — and was a dentist before Congress (general biography, compilation strength). Endorsements located: President Trump ("A MAGA Warrior, who has been with us from the very beginning…" — Truth Social endorsement quoted by the Center Square) and the Freedom Caucus Fund (June 26, 2026). His stated reason for running (Republic, Feb. 21, 2025): to fight for the Trump agenda. Pros: Eight elections won across three maps, the President's endorsement in the warmest terms his endorsements take, Freedom Caucus Fund backing, and an unopposed renomination in an R+15 district — a file of demonstrated, repeated consent from his own voters. Cons: The research file on a 15-year incumbent is, this pass, mostly endorsements and biography — no committee record or scored votes were pulled — and a candidacy whose stated purpose is another man's agenda is, stated plainly, a followership platform. In this district it is also what the voters keep ordering. The flaw, plainly: No conduct flaw and no unclosed math was located in the record we reviewed. The priced item is the one in his own announcement: representation defined as fighting for the Trump agenda is loyalty as a program — a virtue his district prices as one, and a limit this publication notes without pretending it is a disqualifier.
Danielle "Dani" Sterbinsky (D) The record: Sterbinsky is a Navy veteran and a mother (YourValley, Aug. 16, 2025, via Wikipedia citations). She was endorsed by the Forward Party (Oct. 13, 2026). Her located platform (campaign site via FOX 10): housing — rental assistance and first-time-buyer down-payment support; lower childcare and healthcare costs; raise the federal minimum wage; break up corporate consolidation; crack down on algorithmic price fixing; protect rural communities and water; invest in infrastructure. No prior elected office was located. Pros: A veteran's biography, an unopposed primary consolidation, and a platform with two planks — algorithmic price fixing and corporate consolidation — aimed at targets voters in both parties distrust. Cons: The rest of the platform is the federal expansion list: a higher federal minimum wage, rental assistance, and down-payment support are spending programs whose financing no located material prices, in a district registered 44% Republican and priced R+15. The flaw, plainly: Unproven, with an unclosed-math program — a candidate's own promises are a priced species in this series, and hers arrive without the arithmetic — and no exception file, because no service record exists.
G. Seville Hatch and William Perry (Independent, unconfirmed) No record was located for either beyond the single FOX 10 line and Hatch's frequent-candidate history, and nothing further is printed about them.
OUR CALL LiberalMind endorses Paul Gosar.
The incumbent is in-tent, repeatedly re-elected, presidentially endorsed, and carries no located flaw of a priced species in the record reviewed; the challenger is an unproven Democrat whose platform's spending planks do not close on the located evidence and who offers no Manchin-test material, because she has never served. The exception cannot be granted to an empty file, and it is not a close call at R+15 in any event.
The two honest caveats ride with the endorsement, where they were printed: Hatch and Perry's ballot status is unresolved on a single source, and Gosar's own file, at 15 years, should be thicker in the diligence than endorsements and a dentist's biography. The next cycle's research owes this district the voting record. This cycle's call, on this record, is his.
This race is one of hundreds in LiberalMind's Election 2026 coverage. For the complete breakdown — every race, claim by claim — go to liberalmindhq.com.
Vote early. Research your candidates. Choose the best moderates, whatever their party — no extremism from either side. And encourage your friends and family to do the same.
--- Sources - Secretary of State-compiled 2026 Arizona General Election Guide (RLG) — the confirmed two-candidate ballot and the registration figures; Arizona Republic — roster corroboration and Gosar's stated reason for running (Feb. 21, 2025), including its "8th House term" phrasing preserved as a conflict - The Center Square (Oct. 2026) — the unopposed primaries, the "ninth term" rendering, Trump's Truth Social endorsement as quoted, and the Freedom Caucus Fund endorsement (June 26, 2026) - FOX 10 Phoenix CD-9 explainer (Oct. 2026) — the sole source listing independents G. Seville Hatch and William Perry, printed as unresolved, and Sterbinsky's platform via her campaign site; VOTE411 — ballot corroboration; Politics1 — Hatch's frequent write-in candidacy history; YourValley (Aug. 16, 2025), via Wikipedia citations — Sterbinsky's Navy service; Forward Party release (Oct. 13, 2026) — her endorsement
Winner: Paul Dr. Gosar (Republican) — called by the Associated Press. This result was appended on November 4, 2026 (results wave 1); the original article above is unchanged, exactly as published before Election Day.
AI-assisted article — but the sources are human, and the facts are very real.