← Election Series · All house races

Our verdict

LiberalMind endorses Marty O'Donnell — as unproven in elected office, and on watch

Election Day is Tuesday, November 3, 2026, and voting is underway in Nevada. This is the whole race — the records, the claims against each candidate, and what the sources actually show. Read the research, and decide which flaw you can live with.

The setup

Nevada's 3rd District — southwest Las Vegas, Summerlin, Enterprise, out to Searchlight — is the most Republican-leaning of Nevada's three Democratic-held seats: Cook PVI D+1, and Donald Trump carried it in 2024, 49.5% to 48.8%. Rep. Susie Lee (D) has held it since 2018 and was re-elected in 2024 by 51.4%–48.6% — a Democratic incumbent surviving in a Trump seat.

The raters favor her, with the disagreement printed: Cook says Likely D (chart, Oct 23, 2026 — its own race page displays both "Lean D" and "Likely D" fields, a conflict we note rather than resolve), Sabato's Crystal Ball says Likely D (Oct 20), and Inside Elections says Lean D (Oct 15). There are no public general-election polls; Cook's remark that private polls show Lee with "a fairly comfortable lead" is a characterization of non-public data and is not evidence we can print.

The challenger is Marty O'Donnell (R), the composer of the Halo and Destiny soundtracks, who loaned his campaign $3 million and won a four-way primary with 42.3% after President Trump's endorsement. The money, with its periods named because the compilations differ by end date: Lee raised $5,942,432 through October 14, 2026, with $931,300 on hand (FEC via FTP Advocacy; a September 30 compilation put her cash at $1.31 million — different date, printed separately). O'Donnell raised $4,505,131 through September 30 (Green Papers) and $4.82 million through October 14 with $184,500 on hand (FTP) — of which about 70% is his own money, against $3.00 million in committee debt. After Cook's October ratings move, MAGA Inc.'s Safety and Affordability PAC cut a $1 million ad reservation for him. Jon Kamerath of the Independent American Party is the third name on the certified ballot. Nevada law permits no write-in candidates in this race, and the "None of These Candidates" line does not appear for Congress.

Susie Lee (Democratic)

The record: Lee, a nonprofit executive in Las Vegas since 1993, describes herself as a centrist and bipartisan legislator — her claim of a "most bipartisan member of Congress" ranking is attributed to her, with a Common Ground Committee ranking cited by The Nevadan's profile. The documented record underneath the positioning is genuinely mixed, and we print it whole: she voted for the Laken Riley Act; per the Guides.vote Nevada guide she voted to denounce Biden "open-border" policies and has said "if an undocumented immigrant breaks the law, they should be deported"; she supports stricter voter ID laws, drawing pushback from the Las Vegas NAACP chapter; she pledged to reject socialist policies and embrace capitalism. She also voted against the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, voted against increasing ICE funding by $75 billion and then against $70 billion more for DHS, and sponsored a bill pairing border-security funding with a path to legal status for eligible undocumented immigrants including DACA recipients. She co-leads the bill to restore the full gaming-loss deduction the big bill cut — the FULL HOUSE Act package passed Ways & Means on September 17, 2026 — a signature district-industry issue she shares with Rep. Titus.

The worst claims — and the record:

Claim: the stock sale. Lee's periodic transaction reports show a sale of up to $1 million in casino shares ($FLL) dated June 13, 2025, by a trust tied to her; the stock has since fallen sharply. The disclosure figures are from her own filings. Her office's explanation is documented: she was transferring divorce-received holdings into diversified funds, "going above and beyond what's required by law and ethics." The timing-suspicion framing around the sale is partisan in origin and is printed as such. In July 2026 she voted for the bill banning congressional purchases of individual stocks (the Stop Insider Trading Act, passed the House 232–198; blocked in the Senate).

Claim: the lodging bills. Breitbart reported $81,615 in taxpayer-funded D.C. lodging reimbursements for Lee. That report itself notes the reimbursements do not on their own establish a House-rules violation, and her office did not respond. Single partisan source; printed at that weight.

The conduct items — her own words, confirmed by her. On March 31/April 1, 2026, a deleted post by Lee about President Trump's Supreme Court birthright-citizenship visit read in part "So fing fed up. I'll pray they f him to his face"; she added, "Sorry, I say f a lot these days," and on April 1 confirmed the words were hers, defending the sentiment on constitutional-oath grounds. She later told a liberal audience that watching Secretary Hegseth testify made her want to "beat the s--- out of him." These are documented, in her confirmed words, and they sit oddly against the centrist brand — a temperament item, priced as conduct/optics, not as policy extremism.

Pros: An incumbent who has held a Trump-carried seat since 2018; documented centrist positions with real votes attached (Laken Riley, voter ID support, a pledge against socialist policies); the gaming-deduction restoration co-led for her district's industry; the money lead and seven figures in the bank into October.

Cons: The enforcement ledger cuts both ways — she voted against the ICE and DHS funding increases while posing as the border moderate, which is the followership pattern: fund the posture, not the agency. Two profanity episodes in her own confirmed words. A seven-figure trust stock sale whose timing she has answered but not extinguished.

The flaw, plainly: Lee's flaw is the gap between the centrist she campaigns as and the party-line votes on enforcement funding she casts — plus a documented coarseness that undercuts the brand. She is an enabler-class Democrat with genuine moderate positions: positions that stop, every time, at the appropriations line.

Marty O'Donnell (Republican)

The record: O'Donnell is the composer behind Halo and Destiny (and, per Nevada News & Views, the Flintstones vitamins jingle), fired from Bungie in 2014, self-described as a conservative — his coworkers called him the company's most right-leaning employee. He ran for this seat in 2024 and finished fourth in the primary. His enforcement platform is explicit and on the record (Guides.vote): "finishing the wall, mass deportations," "never vote for amnesty," defunding sanctuary cities, localities should "work with ICE." When the Trump administration put out a Halo-themed ICE recruitment post, he answered on X: "When I win, I will 'work with the Trump administration to destroy the Flood once and for all!'" He has never held public office.

The worst claims — and the record:

Claim: his Discord is a sewer he profits from. The Associated Press (Oct 2026) reviewed thousands of posts from 2022–2026 in "The Marty Army," a Discord forum O'Donnell controls with handpicked moderators and uses for campaign organizing and fundraising. AP found racial slurs, minimizations of Nazi Germany, and defenses of white-nationalist conspiracy theories posted by users; a March 2024 user suggested Nazis "did some good things." Print the rest of the record with it: campaign spokesman Keith Schipper responded that O'Donnell "has zero tolerance for hate," that the campaign dedicated a staffer in the spring to monitor the forum, and that about 200 users were banned — and a secondary summary of the AP report states explicitly that no evidence in the AP report shows O'Donnell personally endorsing Nazism or white nationalism. The forum is his, the content was his users', the cleanup is documented, and the personal endorsement is not found. All four clauses are the record. A DCCC release additionally claims he wore a Mussolini mask for Halloween — a partisan-source claim, printed only as such.

Claim: he is a Trump hater wearing a MAGA costume. His own old posts are documented: February 2016 — "Donald Trump is an idiot. Period." A 2017 post said he "loathed" Trump. He later promised to drop out unless Trump endorsed him; Trump endorsed him April 14, 2026, with a "Complete and Total Endorsement," and O'Donnell won the primary. Voters can read the conversion two ways — a man who changed his mind, or a man who priced the district. The chronology is documented either way; a leaked-audio claim and a $50,000 inaugural-committee donation attributed to a Laura Loomer report are unverified in our pass and are not priced.

Claim: he called for persecuting LGBTQ+ people. A former Harris campaign account clipped him that way in July 2026. The full remarks identified the "existential threat" as "Marxism… anti-Western philosophy"; he did not call for persecution in the quoted remarks. The dispute is printed with both sides attributed; the clip, as circulated, does not survive the full quote.

Pros: An explicit enforcement platform with no hedging — the clearest ICE position in the race, from the candidate this publication's doctrine backs on the agency's job. A self-funded campaign ($3 million loaned) that owes no donor map. A primary won after earning the president's endorsement in a district Trump carried.

Cons: Never held office — unproven, and priced as unproven, which means watched, not excused. The campaign is 70% his own money against $3 million in committee debt. The Discord file: he owns the platform where AP-documented extremist content appeared and uses it as a campaign tool. His 2016–2017 words about the president whose endorsement he now runs on.

The flaw, plainly: O'Donnell's flaw is association and moderation — a campaign asset he controls hosted content he says he hates, and the cleanup, though documented, came after years of posts. It is an association flaw with the exculpatory facts on the same page: AP found no evidence he personally endorsed any of it. Against that stands a documented record of the incumbent voting against funding the enforcement she postures about. The species are not equal.

Jon Kamerath (Independent American Party)

Kamerath is on the Clark County certified ballot. No signature program, record, or enforcement position was located for him in our research, and we print the absence rather than fill it in.

OUR CALL

LiberalMind endorses Marty O'Donnell — as unproven in elected office, and on watch.

The criteria, applied plainly. Lee is the strongest moderate presentation in Nevada's Democratic delegation, and we steelman it above at full length — but the Manchin test is passed in service, on our values, at cost, and her record stops at the exact line that matters most to this publication: she voted against the $75 billion ICE increase and the $70 billion DHS increase while campaigning as a border moderate. That is an enabler with good positioning, and positioning is not a break. O'Donnell is unproven — he has never held office, and this endorsement carries the watch that word means. His file's heaviest item, the Discord, is an association flaw: the content was his users', his cleanup is documented, and the AP — no friend to his campaign — found no evidence he personally endorsed the views. His enforcement platform is the district's clearest, in a district Trump carried. Between a proven incumbent whose bipartisanship ends at the enforcement appropriation and an unproven challenger whose worst documented flaw is a forum he failed to police early enough, the doctrine endorses the challenger — eyes open, watch posted.

This race is one of hundreds in LiberalMind's Election 2026 coverage. For the complete breakdown — every race, claim by claim — go to liberalmindhq.com.

Vote early. Research your candidates. Choose the best moderates, whatever their party — no extremism from either side. And encourage your friends and family to do the same.

Sources

Election result — November 4, 2026

Winner: Susie Lee (Democratic) — called by the Associated Press. This result was appended on November 4, 2026 (results wave 2); the original article above is unchanged, exactly as published before Election Day.

AI-assisted article — but the sources are human, and the facts are very real.

← Back to the Election Series