← Election Series · All house races

Our verdict

LiberalMind endorses Brandon Herrera — as unproven in office, and on watch

Election Day is Tuesday, November 3, 2026. Texas early voting runs October 19–30 and is already underway. This is the whole race — why the seat is open, who the nominees are, and what the sources actually show. Read the research, and decide which flaw you can live with.

The setup

Texas's 23rd District — a sprawling, majority-Hispanic border district from San Antonio to El Paso — has had no representative in Congress since April 14, 2026, and will not get one until January. That is the first fact of this race, and it is documented to the letter.

The incumbent was Rep. Tony Gonzales (R), in office since 2021. Gonzales admitted an extramarital affair with a staffer, Regina Santos-Aviles, who died by suicide in September 2025. He denied the affair through early 2026; text messages surfaced before the March primary; he admitted it on March 4, 2026, dropped his re-election campaign on March 5 under pressure from House GOP leadership while the House Ethics Committee investigated, and resigned effective April 14, 2026, at 11:59 p.m. EST — the date and hour are in his own resignation letter to Gov. Greg Abbott, filed with the Texas Secretary of State. Texas governors cannot appoint U.S. Representatives, and Gov. Abbott has not called a special election, which Texas law does not require him to do. As of October 25 the seat had sat vacant 194 days, with roughly 800,000 residents unrepresented (Ballotpedia's vacancy reporting; the day count is compiled by a vacancy tracker whose underlying dates match Ballotpedia's). None of this attaches to either nominee. It is why the seat is open — and how the Republican nominee got here.

In the March 3 Republican primary, Brandon Herrera finished first with 43.3% (23,857 votes) and Gonzales second with 41.7% (22,979), forcing a May runoff. Gonzales then withdrew from the runoff, leaving Herrera the nominee by default — no runoff vote was ever held (Texas Horse Industry runoff summary; FOX 7; San Antonio Current). One October news account (the El Paso Herald Post) wrote that Herrera "defeat[ed] Gonzales by 859" to clinch the nomination; 859 approximates the March primary margin, not a runoff result. The runoff never happened. We flag the error so it does not travel.

The district's numbers: Cook PVI R+7, and Cook itself lists the incumbent on this seat as "VACANT." One compilation puts Trump's 2024 margin here at +15; we print that as a single-compilation figure, with Cook's R+7 as the sourced anchor. The raters: Cook Political Report: Lean R (moved from Likely R on October 23, 2026). Inside Elections: Likely Republican. Sabato's Crystal Ball: Likely Republican. A one-step disagreement, printed as-is. (PollingSource also displays a poll-based "Toss-up" label for this district — that is its polling average's output, not a fourth expert rating, and we do not conflate them.)

The polling is a tie wearing two different dates. PollingSource's average of two polls has Herrera 44.0, Stout 43.0: Normington Petts (Democratic-sponsored, for House Majority PAC), October 7, 400 likely voters — Stout 46, Herrera 46; and Public Policy Polling (Democratic-sponsored), March 11, 521 voters — Herrera 42, Stout 40, from before the Republican nominee was settled. A second compilation (FTP) averages three pollsters at R+2.4 through October 7. Both compilations are printed with their names; we do not blend them. One March fact worth its own line: Stout received about 7,000 more primary votes than Herrera (30,667 to 23,857).

Outside money: $5,149,745 in independent expenditures per PollingSource — $1,422,850 support, $3,726,895 oppose — led by House Majority PAC (D), Ready for the Fight (D), the Freedom Caucus Fund (R), and No Going Back PAC (R). The DCCC added this district to its "Districts in Play" target list in August.

The confirmed ballot: Brandon Herrera (Republican), Katy Padilla Stout (Democratic), and Ben Mendoza (Independent). The independent line is now settled: compilations conflicted — Wikipedia's campaign-website list named Veronica Williams (I), while a sample-ballot compilation named Ben Mendoza (Independent). The Texas Secretary of State's Independent Candidate Filings list for 2026 resolves it: Ben Mendoza of El Paso is listed as a "Candidate in the General Election" for District 23, and Williams appears in no Secretary of State filing. Williams was a website-list name only; Mendoza is the certified independent on the November 3 ballot.

Brandon Herrera (Republican)

The record. Herrera is a firearms manufacturer and YouTube personality known as "The AK Guy," a strong Second Amendment advocate (FOX 7; San Antonio Current, which describes him as "a highly online influencer and activist with a history of edgy, controversial comments"). He challenged Gonzales in 2024 as well and forced a runoff Gonzales won with 50.7%. He has never held elected office: no votes, no governing record. In our taxonomy he is unproven in service — and, unusually, a public figure with a long published record of his own words, which is priced below at exactly its sourcing strength.

He carries President Trump's endorsement ("Complete and Total Endorsement," per FOX 7's reporting of the Truth Social post) and the Freedom Caucus Fund's endorsement.

The public-record file — sourcing labeled, item by item. Herrera's older video and podcast material is the opposition's central file: jokes about veteran suicide, a copy of Mein Kampf displayed and discussed, a Nazi-era submachine gun video using phrases including "the original ghetto blaster," and a 2023 podcast remark that the country "went to sht" after women won the vote. These items are documented in multiple 2026 compilations (Electoral-Vote; El Paso News, October 14, 2026; MeidasTouch via a partisan compilation). The sourcing for the characterizations* is left-leaning and partisan-hosted; the underlying videos are his own published content. We print these as reported items, and we do not print any single quote as verified fact until the primary clips are pulled — that check is still owed. A separate October 2026 report describes a podcast segment in which Herrera laughed during mockery of people with Down syndrome (Meidas News) — single-outlet and opposition-amplified, labeled as such.

The institutional record is stronger sourcing and heavier weight. In 2024 the Republican Jewish Coalition called Herrera a "goose-stepping extremist who pals around with online Nazis" and spent about $400,000 against him, and the AIPAC-linked United Democracy Project spent about $1.06 million against him in five FEC-filed independent expenditures (El Paso News, citing FEC data). Those are documented facts — the words and the money — from organizations inside his own coalition. Per the same account (via Politico), those groups have largely sat out the 2026 general election rather than back Stout. His opponents also call him a carpetbagger (he moved from North Carolina in 2021) and press the fact that this district includes Uvalde, site of the 2022 school shooting (Electoral-Vote — an analysis source, attributed).

On money: Herrera has raised $3,115,205 with $318,812 in cash on hand (PollingSource); the FTP compilation of FEC data through October 14 corroborates his figures.

Pros: A genuine Second Amendment record as an advocate and manufacturer — the position is his career, not a campaign costume; Trump's endorsement; a demonstrated primary electorate (first place in March, and a 2024 runoff against an incumbent); a large fundraising operation.

Cons: Never held office; became the nominee without a runoff vote; carries the heaviest character file of any Republican nominee in this series — much of it from his own published content, the most serious institutional condemnation of it from the Republican Jewish Coalition in 2024.

The flaw, plainly: Herrera's flaw is his own archive. The jokes and remarks are documented as reported above; the RJC's 2024 verdict and $1.46 million in combined spending against him by pro-Israel, Republican-aligned groups are hard fact. None of it is a governing program — his stated politics are standard Second Amendment conservatism, which is why we do not classify him in the extremist tier, a word we reserve for a candidate's personal program — but a man asking for a border district's trust has handed his opponents, and his own side's institutions, a file he cannot unpublish.

Katy Padilla Stout (Democratic)

The record. Stout is a San Antonio attorney and former Northside ISD elementary school teacher. She practices child welfare and education law at her family's firm in Carrizo Springs and has served on the Bexar County Child Welfare Board since 2017 (her campaign-site biography, as compiled by The Ballot Brief). Her campaign priorities, per her site: cost of living, healthcare, gun violence. She won the March 3 Democratic primary outright with 52.0% (30,667 votes) in a four-candidate field, and the DCCC has backed her district since August.

On money (FEC through October 14, per the FTP compilation): Stout has raised $1.12 million with $144,400 in cash on hand, against Herrera's $3.12 million and $318,800.

No scandal or verification failure for Stout was located in the sourced record.

Pros: A child-welfare and education attorney from the district's own legal community; a clean outright primary win with more raw votes than her opponent drew; professional standing in exactly the border-region family-law world this district lives in.

Cons: Never held elected office; outraised nearly three-to-one; her program — cost of living, healthcare, gun violence — is her party's program, with no documented break from it, because she has never held a job where a break was possible.

The flaw, plainly: Stout's flaw is the standard one for an unproven Democrat, and it is mechanical, not personal: a vote for Stout is a vote to organize the House under Democratic leadership, and nothing in her record — because there is no governing record — gives a voter reason to believe she would ever vote against her party when it costs something. The exception we certify has to be earned in service. She has not served.

OUR CALL

LiberalMind endorses Brandon Herrera — as unproven in office, and on watch.

We state the tension honestly, because it is the race. Herrera carries a documented public-record file that we have printed at full strength, including a 2024 condemnation by the Republican Jewish Coalition that no amount of partisan-sourcing discount can erase — the RJC is not a Democratic organ, and it spent real money on its verdict. What keeps this an endorsement rather than a refusal is the species of the flaw. Our extremist classification is a program classification; Herrera's program is the standard conservative program, and his file is rhetoric and conduct from an entertainment career, much of its sharpest wording still resting on partisan compilations whose primary clips remain unpulled. Stout, by contrast, offers the one thing our criteria cannot certify: an unproven Democrat with a party-standard program and no possible Manchin case. Between a flawed Republican whose flaws are priced in print and a Democrat who cannot earn the exception, the criteria give one answer. He is on watch from day one, and his first term will be graded on votes.

This call is flagged for the parent pass: it is borderline. The fact that makes it so is the weight of Herrera's documented public-record file — particularly the RJC's 2024 institutional verdict — against the sourcing caveat that its sharpest quotes have not yet been verified against primary clips.

For the complete Election 2026 breakdown — every race on your ballot, claim by claim — go to liberalmindhq.com.

Vote early. Research your candidates. Choose the best moderates, whatever their party — no extremism from either side. And encourage your friends and family to do the same.

Sources

Election result — November 4, 2026

Winner: Katy Padilla Stout (Democratic) — called by the Associated Press. This result was appended on November 4, 2026 (results wave 1); the original article above is unchanged, exactly as published before Election Day.

AI-assisted article — but the sources are human, and the facts are very real.

← Back to the Election Series