← Election Series · All house races

Election Day is Tuesday, November 3, 2026, and voting is underway in Utah. This is the whole race — the records, the claims, and what the sources actually show. Read the research, and decide which flaw you can live with.

The setup Read the map first, because the number lies. Utah's 2026 districts are a court-ordered redraw, and this UT-02 is not the old UT-02. The incumbent candidate here is Rep. Blake Moore (R), in the House since 2021, elected from the old UT-01 — more than 70% of his old constituents are in this district. Celeste Maloy, who held the old UT-02, is running in the new UT-03; she is not in this race. Old-map PVI figures do not describe this district and we print none. The new-map lean, from Dave's Redistricting App via Ellis Insight: 65.6% R – 20.1% D; ratings summaries call it Solid Republican, with Inside Elections' GOP edge described at roughly 40 points. One poll cuts against that lean and prints as what it is — a single survey, method not fully published: Lighthouse (Sept. 2026) found Moore 39%, Crosby 34%. Five candidates are on the ballot: Blake D. Moore (R), Peter Crosby (D), Daniel Cottam (Libertarian), Robert M. Moesinger (Unaffiliated), and Carlton E. Bowen (Independent American). Moore won the Republican primary over State Rep. Karianne Lisonbee; compilations vary on the margin — 56.7% (52,418 votes) to 43.3% (40,032) in the primary compilation, ~57% and ~58% in others — so we print the vote totals, which are the most precise form located, and note the variance rather than pick a rounded number. Money (FEC): Moore raised about $2.54–2.80 million (two compilations, different through-dates) against Crosby's $138,000–$154,000. Sourcing note: Utah rosters here rest on the official vote.utah.gov filings list and the Lieutenant Governor's amended certification (Sept. 21, 2026) — the strongest sourcing in this batch.

Blake Moore (R) The record: Moore has served since 2021, three terms, and is Vice Chair of the House Republican Conference — Utah's only member of House leadership — serving on the Ways and Means Committee (Ben Walker compilation). Before Congress he co-chaired Better Boundaries, the group behind Proposition 4 — the very measure whose litigation produced the new map; Lisonbee attacked him over that role in the primary. He lives in Salt Lake City, outside the new UT-02 — constitutionally permissible, noted in the compilation as a campaign issue, and his opponent's campaign explicitly runs on "a representative that lives in the district." Pros: A leadership-rank incumbent on the tax-writing committee, renominated against a credible state-representative challenger, holding a district drawn 65.6% Republican with a money advantage of roughly sixteen to one. Cons: His primary margin — about 57–58% against a challenger running partly on his own redistricting history — is soft for a leadership incumbent in a safe seat, and the one located general-election poll had him at 39%. He also lives outside the district he asks to represent; legal, disclosed, and his voters get to price it, but it is in the file. The flaw, plainly: No conduct flaw and no unclosed-math flaw was located. The priced items are political, not disqualifying: he helped build the redistricting measure that ultimately redrew his own map, and he defends the new seat from outside its lines. Both are documented; neither is hidden; neither disqualifies.

Peter Crosby (D) The record: Crosby is a first-time candidate running a self-described clean-money grassroots campaign — no corporate PAC money, 400-plus volunteers, town halls in each county monthly (campaign via KVNU / campaign site). His occupation carries a printed conflict: "tech consultant and project manager; adjunct professor at Utah State University" (Ben Walker / Tribune questionnaire) versus "senior data analyst at Utah State University, from Providence" (KVNU). The Utah State connection is consistent across sources; the exact title is not, and we resolve it in neither direction. No prior elected office was located. Pros: A genuinely grassroots file — volunteers, monthly town halls in every county, no corporate PAC money — and the closest located poll in any of Utah's Republican districts this cycle. Cons: He is a first-time candidate in a 65.6% R district whose own ballot description his campaign and the compilations cannot render consistently, against a leadership incumbent with sixteen times his money. The flaw, plainly: Unproven, plus the math: nothing adverse was located against him, and nothing in his file approaches a Manchin-test break — there is no service record to break from. His flaw is that he is a Democrat with no exception file in a district drawn against his party.

Daniel Cottam (Libertarian), Robert M. Moesinger (Unaffiliated), and Carlton E. Bowen (Independent American) Cottam is a bariatric surgeon who previously ran in the old UT-01 in 2024. Moesinger is a systems engineer and University of Utah graduate backing ranked-choice voting, multi-member House districts, and zoning reform. Bowen is an Air Force veteran and former American Fork City Council member who opposes raising the debt limit and wants Utah's Colorado River share defended (Tribune questionnaires via the Ben Walker compilation).

OUR CALL LiberalMind endorses Blake Moore.

An in-tent incumbent, in leadership, on Ways and Means, with no located conduct flaw — against a first-time Democrat with no exception file. The honest cons are printed above and they are real: a soft primary margin for a safe-seat incumbent, a close single poll, a residence outside the lines, and a redistricting history that came home. None of them is a proven in-service flaw of the species this publication prices against an endorsement, and the residence point is one his primary voters already weighed and answered with 52,418 votes.

Crosby runs the kind of campaign — clean money, town halls, volunteers — that deserves a better district than a 65.6% R redraw gave him. Deserving a hearing is not the same as earning an endorsement, and the exception he would need does not exist in his file.

This race is one of hundreds in LiberalMind's Election 2026 coverage. For the complete breakdown — every race, claim by claim — go to liberalmindhq.com.

Vote early. Research your candidates. Choose the best moderates, whatever their party — no extremism from either side. And encourage your friends and family to do the same.

--- Sources - Utah Lieutenant Governor / vote.utah.gov 2026 Candidate Filings list — the five "Election Candidate" ballot names; Lieutenant Governor's amended certification (Sept. 21, 2026), as used by the Daily Letter Utah guide (Oct. 11, 2026) - Ellis Insight, reporting Dave's Redistricting App leans — the new UT-02 at 65.6% R – 20.1% D; Ben Walker ballot compilation — Moore's leadership role and Ways and Means seat, the Better Boundaries history, the residence issue, the Crosby occupation account, and the minor candidates' records - Critical Report primary compilation — Moore's primary vote totals (52,418–40,032; 56.7%–43.3%), with ~57% and ~58% renderings in other compilations noted as variance - KVNU — Crosby's campaign description and the conflicting Utah State job title; Lighthouse Research / Hinckley Institute poll (Sept. 2026) — Moore 39%, Crosby 34%, printed as a single survey

Election result — November 6, 2026

Winner: Blake Moore (Republican) — called by the Associated Press. This result was appended on November 6, 2026 (results wave 4); the original article above is unchanged, exactly as published before Election Day.

AI-assisted article — but the sources are human, and the facts are very real.

← Back to the Election Series