← Election Series · All senate races

Our verdict

an endorsement, with eyes open

Election Day is November 3. Early voting in Georgia runs October 13 through October 30, and Georgia's majority-vote rule means a December 1 runoff if nobody clears 50 percent. This is the whole race — the platforms, the records, the worst claims against each man, and what the sources actually show. Read the research, and decide for yourself.

How Georgia got here

This seat is not open. Democratic Sen. Jon Ossoff is defending it — the seat he won in the January 2021 runoff that handed his party the Senate — and he is doing it in a state Donald Trump carried by 2.2 points in 2024. Georgia is one of only two Democratic-held Senate seats on the 2026 ballot in a state Trump won, which made it, on paper, the Republicans' best pickup opportunity in America.

The Republican nominee is Rep. Mike Collins of Georgia's 10th District. Collins finished first in the May 19 primary with 40.5 percent against former football coach Derek Dooley and Rep. Buddy Carter, then won the June 16 runoff over Dooley, 55.5 percent to 44.5 percent, after Trump endorsed him in the runoff's final days — calling him a "WARRIOR and WINNER" who had backed him "from the very beginning." Governor Brian Kemp had backed Dooley. Ossoff ran unopposed in his primary.

Here is what the raters say, and it is not what the map promised Republicans: the Cook Political Report moved this race to Likely Democratic on September 23, citing Ossoff's money and profile advantage. Sabato's Crystal Ball also rates it Likely Democratic. Inside Elections is the most generous to Collins, at Tilt Democratic. By mid-October, Ossoff led polling averages by roughly eight points, held more than $42 million in cash on hand to Collins's roughly $2 million, and both parties' big spenders were quietly moving money elsewhere — the Democratic Senate Majority PAC pulled a week of Georgia ads in a stated show of confidence, and the Republican Senate Leadership Fund shifted cash toward other states. A senator serves six years and votes on every law, budget, judge, and cabinet secretary. Georgia's choice matters well beyond Georgia.

Why this seat is in play — and why it may already have slipped

Ossoff was supposed to be vulnerable. He is a first-term senator more liberal than his state, defending a seat in Trump country in a midterm. Instead, the story of this race is the gap between the two campaigns. Ossoff raised on the order of $60 million and built the strongest constituent-service operation in the state — even Republican consultants concede the strength of it, telling Reuters that Republican activists they talk to are "pretty much willing to concede" he will hold the seat. Collins, a two-term congressman and House Freedom Caucus member who built a national profile as Congress's self-described meme poster, won his primary as the movement candidate — and then ran a general-election campaign dogged by questions about the people around him and by attack ads from Ossoff that fact-checkers repeatedly found were built on edited tape. Both of those things are in the record below. Neither man's problem is a mystery. What follows is each man, claim by claim.

Jon Ossoff (Democratic)

His platform: Ossoff is running on costs. He pledges to repeal the Trump tariffs he blames for grocery and diesel prices — "these tariffs are crushing our state, and we'll repeal those tariffs" — and points to his record delivering the bipartisan infrastructure law: lead pipes removed, broadband expanded, ports and airports upgraded across Georgia. His campaign's stated priorities are government-corruption reform, housing affordability, and civil rights. On abortion, his position is unambiguous: Georgia's six-week ban "strips women of autonomy," and he has sponsored legislation to prohibit government restrictions on abortion nationwide. In March 2025 he voted against the Republican bill to bar biological men from women's sports; his office argued school districts and athletic associations, not the federal government, should set those rules — a position activist Riley Gaines has made a centerpiece of the campaign against him.

The worst claims — and the record:

Claim: Ossoff supported a $2,100 tax increase on average Americans and voted to gut the child tax credit. This comes from a One Nation ad built around a grocery bill. The fact-check record is not kind to it: the cited Tax Foundation analysis does not contain the ad's number, and the figure appears borrowed from a different Tax Foundation estimate of the average tax cut under the 2025 Republican tax law — a law Ossoff voted against, as did every Democrat. Voting against a tax cut is a position voters can judge. Turning it into a specific $2,100 increase with a source that does not say that is something else.

Claim: Ossoff did nothing on the Laken Riley Act. Collins authored the Laken Riley Act in the House — the law, signed in January 2025 and named for the University of Georgia student murdered by a man in the country illegally, requiring detention of illegal immigrants charged with theft and related crimes. In their October debate, Collins charged that Ossoff "didn't lift a finger" on it. Ossoff answered that he voted for the legislation in the Senate while criticizing the administration's enforcement tactics. The Senate vote is a matter of record: the charge, as stated, does not survive it.

Claim: Ossoff opposes Israel. Collins's side points to Ossoff's votes against specific weapons deliveries to Israel. Those votes are real and checkable, and voters who care about the alliance should weigh them. What the record also shows is a senator endorsed by AIPAC in his own earlier races and by mainstream pro-Israel organizations in this one — the honest version of the criticism is about particular arms-sale votes, not abandonment.

The flaw, plainly: Ossoff is, by the evidence, a diligent senator and a formidable campaigner. His problem for the voters this publication serves is not competence. It is where he stands when his party's platform meets our values: abortion protected by federal law as a first principle, the federal government kept out of women's sports only because he would keep it out of your daughter's locker room debate entirely, and a consistent vote with the national Democratic agenda on taxes and spending. He is not a Manchin-style exception. He is a skilled representative of the other set of values.

Mike Collins (Republican)

His platform: Collins is running as the America First candidate, in his words, so that "President Trump would need a Republican Congress to deliver the America First Agenda." The substance behind the slogan is a real House record: he authored the Laken Riley Act; he is a Freedom Caucus member who calls the national debt the country's top threat, pushes a balanced-budget amendment, voted against the 2023 debt-ceiling deal, and has opposed nearly every stopgap funding bill as insufficiently serious about cuts. He co-sponsored legislation to repeal the National Firearms Act's core restrictions. He is unapologetically pro-life and supports Georgia's six-week heartbeat law. His foreign policy is "peace through strength" — support for Israel as "our greatest ally in the Middle East," insistence that Iran never get a nuclear weapon, and skepticism of open-ended overseas spending. He defends the Trump tariffs as protection for Georgia farmers and timber against cheap foreign imports.

The worst claims — and the record:

Claim: Collins "admitted" Trump is in the Epstein files. This was Ossoff's June ad, built on a clipped recording from an August 2025 campaign stop. PolitiFact rated the claim Mostly False. The full exchange shows Collins saying the opposite of what the ad implies: asked if Trump is in the files, Collins answered, "Yeah, I'm sure he's in there. Because he was the one telling the FBI about it. He's the one that kicked the guy out of Mar-a-Lago and then called the FBI" — and added, in the same conversation, "we need to release them." The ad cut the tape at the exact word where the explanation begins.

Claim: Collins wants to force retirees off Social Security. Ossoff's September ads used a June 2025 radio clip of Collins talking about getting people off Social Security and back to work, over images of seniors. FactCheck.org found the ads took the remarks out of context — the full interview ranged across Medicaid, Social Security, and work incentives — and PolitiFact likewise found Collins had not advocated forcing retirees off the program. Collins's campaign says he misspoke and meant moving people from Medicaid to employer coverage; FactCheck.org noted, fairly, that he did not correct himself in the interview itself. An edited clip, a plausible explanation, and a candidate who gave his opponents the raw material: all three things are true.

Claim: Collins was "handed a company by his rich daddy." The AJC's fact-check bent this one too. Collins's father Mac was a congressman, and the family trucking business was real. But Mike Collins started his own company in 1992 and later bought his father out; he had never held elected office before 2022. A privileged start, yes. A handed-over company, no.

Claim: Collins is an extremist surrounded by extremists. This is the serious one, and it deserves a serious answer rather than a label. The documented record: in 2024 Collins replied approvingly on social media to an antisemitic account targeting a Jewish reporter. His former chief of staff was reported to have participated in group chats with far-right figures; the campaign says that staffer is gone and Collins condemns antisemitism. A former campaign aide was photographed in a Ku Klux Klan uniform with a swastika image; the campaign called the posts "vile," condemned them, and said the aide was fired. CNN reported in July 2026 that Collins's son-in-law is a white-nationalist influencer with more than 1.5 million followers. And a former chief of staff's alleged misuse of taxpayer money has drawn a House Ethics inquiry with which Collins says he is cooperating. Ossoff — Georgia's first Jewish senator — calls Collins a "notorious bigot, antisemite, and extremist." That label is a characterization, and fact-checkers do not rule on characterizations. What is documented is a pattern: one episode is an accident, two are carelessness, and this many is a judgment question about the company a man keeps and the vetting he runs. Collins has condemned and severed in each case. He has not explained why the cases keep occurring.

Claim: Collins supports a total abortion ban with no exceptions. Ossoff pressed this in the debates. Collins's record includes sponsoring legislation declaring life begins at conception — the basis for the charge — and in an earlier run he backed a ban without exceptions. His stated position in this race is support for Georgia's law, which contains exceptions for rape, incest, and the life of the mother, and he said so on the debate stage. Voters are entitled to weigh the old sponsorship against the current word. Both are his.

The flaw, plainly: On the values this publication measures — taxes, spending, the border, the Second Amendment, the right to life, free enterprise — Collins's platform and his House votes are the conservative platform, without trimming. His flaw is not the platform. It is discipline: a campaign that keeps handing the other side documented material about the people in his orbit, and a candidate whose own careless words on a radio show became the other side's best ad. The question with Collins is not what he would vote for. It is whether the operation around him is as serious as his voting record.

The verdict: an endorsement, with eyes open

We did not endorse in Texas, and the reader can check that piece for our standard: an endorsement is earned on values and record, not given to a party.

By that standard, Georgia is different. Collins's record is not a concession judgment, an indictment history, or a platform at war with our values. It is two terms of voting the way he campaigns: the Laken Riley Act with his name on it, the debt-ceiling deal voted down, the NFA repeal co-sponsored, Georgia's heartbeat law defended. And the two most damaging advertisements against him were found by independent fact-checkers to be built on edited tape — the Epstein clip rated Mostly False by PolitiFact, the Social Security ads found out of context by FactCheck.org. A man should be judged on his record, and his opponents should have to beat the real one.

The reservations are real, and we state them in the same breath: the recurring extremist-adjacent figures in his orbit are his responsibility even when he fires them, and a senator who cannot vet his own staff will be tested harder in Washington. We are watching that, and so should Georgia.

But measured against the alternative — an able senator whose values on life, taxes, and federal power run opposite to ours as a matter of stated principle — this is the one race in this series where the answer is clear. LiberalMind endorses Mike Collins. Vote early. Research your candidates. And in Georgia, the research points one way.

Sources

AI-assisted article — but the sources are human, and the facts are very real.

← Back to the Election Series