← Election Series · All senate races

Our verdict

LiberalMind endorses Jim Risch

Election Day is November 3. Senator Jim Risch has held public office in Idaho continuously since the end of 1974 and is seeking a fourth Senate term. The twist in this race is the empty chair: the man who won the Democratic primary is not on the ballot — he withdrew so an independent could run one-on-one. There is no Democrat in this race. Four names are. This is the whole race — the records, the pledge at its center, and what the sources actually show. Read the research, and decide.

How Idaho got here

Idaho held its primaries on May 19, 2026. Risch won the Republican primary with 67.3% over three minor challengers. David Roth won the Democratic primary with 61.9% — and then withdrew, announcing on July 28 under pressure from state Democratic figures to clear the field for independent Todd Achilles, with a June report showing barely $1,000 on hand; his formal withdrawal was filed August 28. Roth is context, not a candidate: the Idaho Secretary of State's final ballot names four candidates — Risch (Republican), Achilles (Independent), Natalie Fleming (Independent), and Matt Loesby (Libertarian) — and no Democrat. Stale guides still pricing a Democrat in this race are wrong.

The raters: Cook Solid R, Inside Elections Solid Republican, Sabato's Crystal Ball Safe R. The polling is a swamp of sponsored surveys and we print it with its sponsors attached: Peak Insights for the Risch campaign (Sept. 28–30) had Risch 49, Achilles 24; VoteNExus for the Achilles campaign (Oct. 21–22) had Risch 49, Achilles 43. One firm's August surveys are reported in two irreconcilable versions — same sample size, different dates, opposite leaders — both campaign-sponsored; we flag the conflict and average nothing. The money compilations conflict too, so we print no single total: PollingSource puts Risch at $3,935,512 raised and $2,122,235 on hand, Achilles at $1,921,132 and $195,819; IVN, through September 30, puts Risch at $4.9 million and $2.8 million, Achilles at $1.7 million and $395,407. Every compilation agrees on the shape: Risch holds a cash advantage of several-to-one, and Achilles has raised serious money for an independent. Outside spending is minimal — about $105,000 from the Forward Party Victory Fund backing Achilles.

Jim Risch (Republican)

His record: Fifty-one years of it. Idaho state senator for 22 years, lieutenant governor twice, governor from May 2006 to January 2007, and U.S. senator since 2009. He chairs the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. His signature posture is the alliance institutionalist and foreign-policy hawk: in February 2026 he co-led a bipartisan letter — with Democrat Chris Coons among others — pressing Taiwan to fund its own defense budget and committing to clear the U.S. arms-delivery backlog. The NRA endorses him with an A+ rating. He has won every statewide race he has entered — five campaigns since 2002 averaging about 60%, including a 29-point margin in 2020.

The case against him, honestly sorted: The opposition's case is tenure itself — 51 years in office, "a lifetime pursuing his own power" in his challenger's phrase — plus cost-of-living outcomes under his party's government, and a claim, sourced to the Achilles campaign and not independently verified, that he has held no town hall in 18 years. The challenger also argues age: Risch is 83, running for a term that would end at 89, and voters, Achilles says, want a senator who will "remain sharp and effective for the full six-year term." No health event or capacity incident is sourced anywhere in this record. Under our pricing, that entire file is rhetoric about tenure and outcomes — the weakest species of flaw there is — because no in-service failure, personal-conduct item, or broken-promise math was sourced against him in this pass.

Pros: Foreign Relations chairman; five decades of Idaho service with an unbroken record of winning statewide; a hawkish alliance record that matches his stated platform vote for vote; NRA A+; a cash advantage on every compilation, whatever the exact figures.

Cons: The tenure case is not nothing — five decades is a long time for one man to hold a state's offices, and a senator who never has to worry about re-election can stop listening; his challenger's town-hall claim, though challenger-sourced, has gone unanswered. His age is a fact voters may weigh even though no capacity incident is sourced.

The flaw, plainly: There is no proven flaw in service to print, and we will not manufacture one. The case against Risch is an argument about how long is too long — a legitimate argument, and the lightest one in our taxonomy. Voters who make it should know that is what they are making: an argument, not a record.

Todd Achilles (Independent)

Achilles's résumé is genuine: a U.S. Army veteran who commanded tanks, a telecom executive and college professor afterward. His political biography is recent and it is the race. He was a registered Republican until early 2024, then changed affiliation and was appointed to a Boise seat in the Idaho House as a Democrat after a Democratic representative resigned; he became the House Democratic minority caucus chair in 2024, then resigned his seat to run for the Senate as an independent. Idaho Democratic leaders then pressed their own primary winner out of the race to clear his path — a real display of political strength, and a fact about whose coalition built this candidacy.

The caucus pledge — the decisive item, stated exactly: Achilles has pledged not to caucus with either party. That pledge is documented, explicit, and — unlike a comparable candidacy this series examined in Nebraska, where the independent's record contained a contradictory "caucus with everybody" statement alongside the pledge — no contradictory quote was located in this pass. The pledge is clean. It is also a promise, and the record it has to stand against is this: as a Democratic state representative in 2024, Achilles voted against bills protecting employees' right to carry and self-defense and expanding firearm carry on public property; he was one of only two Idaho candidates endorsed that year by Everytown and Moms Demand Action; and the NRA grades him F — "true enemy of gun owners' rights," in the NRA's words. (Those votes and endorsements reach us summarized by a conservative outlet from the legislative record; the F grade and the gun-control endorsement are independently consistent with his Democratic tenure.) His visible coalition is the Idaho AFL-CIO, the National Education Association, Forward Party money, and promotion by Andrew Yang; the state GOP chair calls him "one of the most left-wing Democrats in the statehouse," which is opposition rhetoric and labeled as such. His stated pitch: stand up to monopolies, defend free markets, protect small businesses and producers, safeguard families online.

Pros: A veteran-executive-legislator résumé, unusual in a challenger. An explicit, uncontradicted no-caucus pledge — the cleanest version of that promise any independent in this series has made. Serious fundraising for an independent, and the political muscle to clear a major party's nominee out of his way.

Cons: His most recent in-service record — two years old — is a Democratic caucus chairmanship with gun votes Idaho's electorate rejects, now wrapped in an independent frame built on a party conversion completed in 2024. The independent he is running as is the thing he has never been in office.

The flaw, plainly: Record versus framing, plus an unproven promise. The pledge may be sincere. But a pledge is an own-promise item, weighed against proven votes — and the proven votes say that when this man last held power, he held it as a Democratic caucus leader voting the other side's line on the Second Amendment. A voter is asked to believe the promise over the record. That is the transaction, stated plainly.

Natalie Fleming (Independent) and Matt Loesby (Libertarian)

Fleming is a software developer and supply-chain specialist who answered press questionnaires; she has reported no FEC contributions and has almost no public record to price. Loesby, the Libertarian nominee, did not respond to press interview requests and has raised $0. Both hold real ballot lines from the Secretary of State; both are unproven with essentially no record. Achilles's own camp worries Fleming could siphon votes he needs. That is everything sourced about either of them, and we will not pad it.

OUR CALL

LiberalMind endorses Jim Risch.

This is the call the Nebraska race set up, with the facts running the other way on the pledge and the same way on the record. We credit Achilles's no-caucus pledge as stated — it is cleaner than Osborn's, and we say so. But price what the pledge actually buys Idaho even if it is kept in full: the state trades a proven, organizing conservative vote — a Foreign Relations chairman whose record matches his platform across five decades — for a non-organizing vote whose individual votes, on the only in-service evidence available, track a Democratic caucus chair with an NRA F grade. Kept, the pledge makes him a less reliable version of what he replaces; broken, it makes him an organizing vote for the other side. Neither outcome survives the comparison. And against Risch there is no proven flaw to weigh in the other pan — only tenure, the weakest argument in our taxonomy. Proven beats unproven, and a clean promise does not outrank a fifty-year record that has never once required an apology of this kind. Risch should hold this seat.

For the complete Election 2026 breakdown — every race, claim by claim — see the full coverage on our website.

Vote early. Research your candidates. Choose the best moderates, whatever their party — no extremism from either side. And encourage your friends and family to do the same.

Sources

Election result — November 4, 2026

Winner: Jim Risch (Republican) — called by the Associated Press. This result was appended on November 4, 2026 (results wave 1); the original article above is unchanged, exactly as published before Election Day.

AI-assisted article — but the sources are human, and the facts are very real.

← Back to the Election Series