← Election Series · State Legislature coverage · California districts
No endorsement
Update — October 25, 2026: Verification review of this article withdrew the original endorsement. Both general-election candidates are Republicans with no distinguishing service record in the compiled file; the original call endorsed the first-listed candidate without a record basis. Corrected below: no endorsement.
The race
One Assembly seat is at stake. The seat is open. Incumbent James Gallagher (R) is not on the general ballot — Incumbent did not file for re-election (Ballotpedia retiring incumbents list). Both general-election candidates advanced under California's top-two primary. No Democratic candidate on the general ballot. California uses a top-two primary: the two highest finishers advance to the general election regardless of party, which is why some districts below show two candidates of the same party and no candidate of the other. The confirmed general-election roster, per Ballotpedia — California State Assembly elections, 2026 (roster strength: compilation (Ballotpedia)), is: Dom Belza (R); James Johansson (R). No district partisan baseline is printed because none was verified at this sourcing depth — we do not invent one.
The candidates, claim by claim
Dom Belza (R) — former incumbent's seat is open; this candidate is a general-election nominee, on the confirmed general ballot per Ballotpedia — California State Assembly elections, 2026.
Pros: In-tent under our criteria: the Republican candidate in a state whose Democratic supermajorities advance the program we oppose. Cons: No detailed legislative voting record, biography beyond the roster, or campaign-finance file for this candidate was verified at this sourcing depth. The flaw, plainly: None proven was located in the compiled record; where the candidate has never served, they are unproven — a watch posture, never a demerit.
James Johansson (R) — former incumbent's seat is open; this candidate is a general-election nominee, on the confirmed general ballot per Ballotpedia — California State Assembly elections, 2026.
Pros: In-tent under our criteria: the Republican candidate in a state whose Democratic supermajorities advance the program we oppose. Cons: No detailed legislative voting record, biography beyond the roster, or campaign-finance file for this candidate was verified at this sourcing depth. The flaw, plainly: None proven was located in the compiled record; where the candidate has never served, they are unproven — a watch posture, never a demerit.
OUR CALL
We make no endorsement in this race. No Democrat is on this general ballot, and both candidates — Belza and Johansson — are Republicans, in-tent under our criteria, with no proven in-service flaw located in the compiled record. But nothing in the compiled file distinguishes one from the other: neither carries a service record, a signature claim, or a documented position the other lacks. An endorsement is earned with math and consistency, not by ballot order. Both men are unproven, and on watch; if a distinguishing record surfaces before November 3, this page will say so in a dated note.
For the complete Election 2026 breakdown — every race, claim by claim — see the full coverage on our website.
Vote early. Research your candidates. Choose the best moderates, whatever their party — no extremism from either side. And encourage your friends and family to do the same.
Sources
- Ballotpedia — California State Assembly elections, 2026 — general-election roster, incumbency, and open-seat status (roster strength: compilation (Ballotpedia)) — https://ballotpedia.org/California_State_Assembly_elections,_2026
- Ballotpedia, Annual State Legislative Competitiveness Report, Vol. 16, 2026 — California 2026: 88 of 100 seats contested by both major parties; Senate competitiveness index 32.8, Assembly 17.9 — https://ballotpedia.org/Annual_State_Legislative_Competitiveness_Report:_Vol._16,_2026
- Record gaps: no detailed legislative voting record, biography beyond the roster and the notes sourced above, campaign-finance figures, or district partisan baseline were verified for the candidates in this district at this sourcing depth; no California Secretary of State certified general list in usable form was located (see research file), so the roster stands at compilation strength
- Standing check: no pedophile-association material meeting the proven standard (knowing association with or defense of a convicted pedophile) was located for any candidate on this ballot
Result pending. No verified call (Associated Press or official) as of November 4, 2026. This page will be updated when the race is called or certified. The original article above is unchanged.
AI-assisted article — but the sources are human, and the facts are very real.
← All California state-legislative districts · Full state-legislative enumeration