← Election Series · State Legislature coverage · Oregon districts
Endorses Lancaster
The race
Oregon Senate District 13 elects one senator on November 3, 2026, for a four-year term. The incumbent is Courtney Neron (Democratic Party). The confirmed general-election roster is: Courtney Neron (Democratic Party); Glenn Lancaster (Republican Party); Tim Nelson (Libertarian Party).
No published district-level competitiveness rating was located for this district at this sourcing depth. Democrats hold the Oregon Senate 18–12 and the Oregon House 37–23 going into the election (contemporaneous Oregon reporting); those are chamber standings, not district ratings.
Ballot note from the roster source: Ballotpedia lists the incumbent as Courtney Neron (Wikipedia: Courtney Neron Misslin). Neron also holds the Working Families Party nomination (fusion). Oregon fusion candidacies shown in Ballotpedia's Other column are the same candidates under additional party nominations, not additional candidates.
Name note — PRINTED, NOT RESOLVED: Ballotpedia lists the incumbent as Courtney Neron; Wikipedia lists her as Courtney Neron Misslin. The roster follows Ballotpedia.
The candidates, claim by claim
Courtney Neron (Democratic Party), incumbent. Courtney Neron appears on the confirmed general-election roster for this district (Ballotpedia general-election table, accessed October 25, 2026). No detailed voting-record, biography, or signature-claim file for this candidate was verified at this sourcing depth beyond the offices and ballot status stated here, and none is invented here.
Pros: A sitting incumbent whose constituents know the record. Cons: A party-line Democrat with no documented break with the party toward this publication's values located — no Manchin-test break. In the Senate, a Democratic organizing vote is heavy: it carries chamber control and the judicial pipeline with it. The flaw, plainly: Enabler class, not extremist — a reliable party-line vote, which is the standing reason the exception for a Democrat is not earned here.
Glenn Lancaster (Republican Party), nominee. Glenn Lancaster appears on the confirmed general-election roster for this district (Ballotpedia general-election table, accessed October 25, 2026). No detailed voting-record, biography, or signature-claim file for this candidate was verified at this sourcing depth beyond the offices and ballot status stated here, and none is invented here.
Pros: The Republican nominee; Republicans and conservatives are in-tent under this publication's values (Constitution, capitalism and the free market, Christianity, freedom). Cons: No service record was verified at this sourcing depth — the candidacy is unproven, which is a watch posture, not a demerit. The flaw, plainly: None proven — unproven is not a flaw.
Tim Nelson (Libertarian Party), nominee. Tim Nelson appears on the confirmed general-election roster for this district (Ballotpedia general-election table, accessed October 25, 2026). No detailed voting-record, biography, or signature-claim file for this candidate was verified at this sourcing depth beyond the offices and ballot status stated here, and none is invented here.
Pros: A further choice on the general-election ballot. Cons: No record was located at this sourcing depth that aligns this candidacy with this publication's values, and no Manchin-test or other exception basis applies. The flaw, plainly: None proven was located in the compiled record; there is also no basis in the compiled record for this publication's endorsement.
OUR CALL
We endorse Glenn Lancaster (Republican Party) — as unproven, and on watch. Glenn Lancaster is the Republican nominee; the Democratic alternative does not pass the Manchin test on any record located, and no proven flaw disqualifying the Republican was located. The endorsement carries the unproven form because no prior service record for the nominee was located at this sourcing depth: support, with the record to be watched. No extremist classification is made for any candidate here: no documented DSA membership, self-described democratic-socialist identification, or authored socialist program was located for any candidate on this ballot, and enabler is not extremist.
For the complete Election 2026 breakdown — every race, claim by claim — see the full coverage on our website.
Vote early. Research your candidates. Choose the best moderates, whatever their party — no extremism from either side. And encourage your friends and family to do the same.
Sources
- Ballotpedia, "Oregon State Senate elections, 2026" — general-election roster, incumbency markers, fusion nominations, and ballot-status notes (accessed October 25, 2026): https://ballotpedia.org/Oregon_State_Senate_elections,_2026
- Wikipedia, "2026 Oregon State Senate election" — official campaign-website listings by district and incumbency context (accessed October 25, 2026)
- Named local reporting used for spot-verification in the districts listed in the research file: The Canyon Weekly (Senate District 6), Hillsboro Today and News in the Grove (Senate District 15), the Salem-area voter guide (Senate Districts 10–11, House Districts 19–24), Oregon Capital Chronicle via Statesman Journal (House District 21), NW Labor Press union guide (House Districts 40–44)
- Record gaps: no district-level competitiveness rating, detailed legislative voting record, biography beyond the offices and ballot status stated, or campaign-finance file was verified for the candidates in this district at this sourcing depth
- Standing check: no pedophile-association material meeting the proven standard (knowing association with or defense of a convicted pedophile) was located for any candidate on this ballot
Result pending. No verified call (Associated Press or official) as of November 4, 2026. This page will be updated when the race is called or certified. The original article above is unchanged.
AI-assisted article — but the sources are human, and the facts are very real.
← All Oregon state-legislative districts · Full state-legislative enumeration