← Election Series · State Legislature coverage · Vermont districts
Endorses Collamore
The race
3 state Senate seats are at stake in Vermont's Rutland District, for a two-year term, elected by plurality block voting — each voter may vote for up to 3 candidates. The incumbent senators are Brian Collamore (Republican), Dave Weeks (Republican), and Terry Williams (Republican). The confirmed general-election roster, from Wikipedia's district general-election table (which compiles the Vermont Secretary of State's general-election candidate list), is: Brian Collamore (Republican); Dave Weeks (Republican); Terry Williams (Republican); Dave Wolk (Independent). Chamber control is rated Safe Democratic by both Sabato's Crystal Ball (January 22, 2026) and State Navigate (October 24, 2026), per the predictions tables compiled on Wikipedia; no district-level rating was published in the sources consulted.
The candidates, claim by claim
Brian Collamore (R), nominee. Appears on the confirmed general-election roster for this district (Wikipedia's district general-election table, accessed October 25, 2026). No detailed voting-record, biography, or signature-claim file for this candidate was verified at this sourcing depth, and none is invented here.
Pros: The Republican nominee in this race; Republicans and conservatives are in-tent under this publication's values (Constitution, capitalism and the free market, Christianity, freedom). A sitting incumbent whose constituents know the record. Cons: No proven flaw meeting this publication's standard was located in the compiled record. The flaw, plainly: None proven was located in the compiled record.
Dave Weeks (R), nominee. Appears on the confirmed general-election roster for this district (Wikipedia's district general-election table, accessed October 25, 2026). No detailed voting-record, biography, or signature-claim file for this candidate was verified at this sourcing depth, and none is invented here.
Pros: The Republican nominee in this race; Republicans and conservatives are in-tent under this publication's values (Constitution, capitalism and the free market, Christianity, freedom). A sitting incumbent whose constituents know the record. Cons: No proven flaw meeting this publication's standard was located in the compiled record. The flaw, plainly: None proven was located in the compiled record.
Terry Williams (R), nominee. Appears on the confirmed general-election roster for this district (Wikipedia's district general-election table, accessed October 25, 2026). No detailed voting-record, biography, or signature-claim file for this candidate was verified at this sourcing depth, and none is invented here.
Pros: The Republican nominee in this race; Republicans and conservatives are in-tent under this publication's values (Constitution, capitalism and the free market, Christianity, freedom). A sitting incumbent whose constituents know the record. Cons: No proven flaw meeting this publication's standard was located in the compiled record. The flaw, plainly: None proven was located in the compiled record.
Dave Wolk (Independent), nominee. Dave Wolk is a former Democratic state senator running as an independent (Wikipedia, Rutland district section, citing VTDigger).
Pros: Gives the district's voters an additional choice on the ballot beyond the two major parties. Cons: No record of alignment with this publication's values, and no Manchin-test-style break file, was located in the compiled record at this sourcing depth. The flaw, plainly: None proven was located in the compiled record; the candidacy is not one this publication can endorse on the record located.
OUR CALL
We endorse Brian Collamore (R), Dave Weeks (R), and Terry Williams (R). This district elects 3 senators and the endorsement covers the Republican slate. No proven flaw was located in any Republican nominee's compiled record. No Democratic nominee passes the Manchin test on any record located — no documented in-service break with their party toward this publication's values — and in the Senate that organizing vote is the heaviest on the ballot. No extremist classification is made for any candidate here except where the article states the personal-program test and its result.
For the complete Election 2026 breakdown — every race, claim by claim — see the full coverage on our website.
Vote early. Research your candidates. Choose the best moderates, whatever their party — no extremism from either side. And encourage your friends and family to do the same.
Sources
- Wikipedia, "2026 Vermont Senate election" — district general-election tables, incumbents, retirements and primary results (accessed October 25, 2026) — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Vermont_Senate_election
- Vermont Secretary of State, "General Election Candidates" (the official candidate list underlying the Wikipedia district tables; cited there as retrieved July 27, 2026)
- Wikipedia, "Vermont Senate" — current membership and fusion lines (accessed October 25, 2026)
- Record gaps: no district-level legislative voting records, campaign-finance figures, or biographies beyond the offices and facts printed above were verified for the nominees in this district at this sourcing depth; no district-level competitiveness rating beyond the chamber ratings printed above was published in the sources consulted
- Standing check: no pedophile-association material meeting the proven standard (knowing association with or defense of a convicted pedophile) was located for any candidate on this ballot
Result pending. No verified call (Associated Press or official) as of November 4, 2026. This page will be updated when the race is called or certified. The original article above is unchanged.
AI-assisted article — but the sources are human, and the facts are very real.
← All Vermont state-legislative districts · Full state-legislative enumeration