← Election Series · All statewide races

Our verdict

LiberalMind endorses Matt Gentry — as unproven for this office, and on watch

Election Day is November 3. The Public Service Commission regulates Alabama's utilities, and 2026 remade it twice over: Gov. Kay Ivey signed a 2026 law expanding the commission from three members to seven, with four governor-appointed members and all seats eventually elected by congressional district — and in Place 1, Republican voters threw out Commissioner Jeremy Oden, in office since 2012, giving Cullman County Sheriff Matt Gentry roughly 75% of the primary vote on a utility-accountability campaign built on one documented fact: "The Alabama PSC has not held a rate case since 1981." Gentry's Democratic opponent, James O. Gordon, won his primary with 57.8% and has raised $11,243 against Gentry's $822,951 — his campaign reported $74 cash on hand. No ratings exist for PSC races and no public general-election polling was located; the documented competitiveness evidence is the primary record itself. LiberalMind endorses Matt Gentry — as unproven for this office, and on watch. Read the research, and see why.

How Alabama got here

Place 1 and Place 2 are elected statewide to four-year terms (Montgomery Advertiser voter guide; Generation 180). The PSC President seat is not on the November 2026 ballot in any source consulted; the seat is held by gubernatorial appointee Cynthia Almond. The 2026 restructuring is documented: Ivey appointed four new members (Ron Burgess, Fred Johnson, Demarcus Joiner, Quinton Ross) from lists recommended by legislative leaders of both parties, to terms beginning January 18 — the report prints the start as "Jan. 18" with the surrounding context of the January after this election; the year is a record gap, flagged, and we print the Alabama Daily News version (a signed law with named appointees) over summary versions.

Oden lost the May 19 Republican primary to Gentry with roughly 75% for Gentry (Energy and Policy Institute). One national piece misnames him "Mike Gentry" in a paragraph — every ballot source says Matt Gentry, and this article uses the ballot name. Gordon won the Democratic primary with 57.8% (187,983) over Jeff Ramsey and John Northrop (Wikipedia PSC page primary table). The printed ballot — Gentry (R) vs. Gordon (D) — is corroborated by the Etowah County guide, the Democratic nominee list, and Ballotpedia.

The money (Alabama FCPA, reports as of October 16, 2026, via the Wikipedia PSC page): Gentry raised $822,951, other receipts $600,000, spent $849,028, cash on hand $573,923. Gordon raised $11,243, other receipts $14,539, spent $25,800, cash on hand $74. That is roughly 73-to-1 on fundraising — the largest money mismatch in the Alabama file.

Matt Gentry (Republican) — a proven county officeholder with a ratepayer mandate

Background and service: Sheriff of Cullman County. He ousted a 14-year incumbent commissioner in the primary on a utility-accountability platform, including a pledge to hold a public rate hearing on Alabama Power's rates (Energy and Policy Institute), in a cycle when, per the same reporting, utility-regulator incumbents struggled across the Southeast on electricity costs.

That pledge is his signature claim, and we price it as what it is: a promise, not a result. Its factual premise — no PSC rate case since 1981 — is the documented campaign issue as reported; the promise itself is unproven until a hearing happens. Under our standard, an unkept-yet promise by a candidate who has never held the office is not a math failure; it is the thing the watch posture exists for.

Status: No prior utility-regulation record — unproven for this office; proven in county law-enforcement elective office, where he has won and held a countywide mandate.

Pros: The clearest voter verdict in the Alabama down-ballot: about 75% against a 14-year incumbent, on an accountability platform aimed at the commission's central failure — four decades without a rate case. A countywide elected official, not a novice. Funded to compete: $573,923 on hand.

Cons: A sheriff's skill set is not a utility regulator's; rate design, return on equity, and fuel-cost pass-throughs are technical terrain on which he has no record. His mandate is a mood — ratepayer anger — and moods do not set rates.

The flaw, plainly: None proven against him was located. The honest entry is an unproven-for-this-office candidacy carried by a documented primary landslide.

James O. Gordon (Democratic) — an insufficient record, stated plainly

What is sourced: Gordon won a three-candidate Democratic primary with 57.8% (187,983 votes). His campaign raised $11,243 and reported $74 cash on hand as of October 16, 2026. No further biographical or record material was located in this research — a near-blank public record at this sourcing depth, and we do not print a biography we could not source.

No program for the commission, no record in office, and no Manchin-test break was located.

Pros: He won his party's primary outright in a three-way field with 187,983 votes — a real electoral result, and the only one in his file.

Cons: Everything else is a gap: no located biography, no located program, and a campaign that ended October with $74.

The flaw, plainly: Insufficient record. As with every such entry in this series, that is a statement about the file, not the man — and it cannot carry an endorsement.

OUR CALL

LiberalMind endorses Matt Gentry — as unproven for this office, and on watch.

Place 1 turns on a documented voter verdict: Alabama Republicans removed a 14-year commissioner by roughly three-to-one because the commission has not held a rate case since 1981, and the man they chose ran explicitly on holding one. That is a mandate with a measurable deliverable, and it is why the watch posture has teeth here — if no public rate hearing on Alabama Power's rates happens, this endorsement's stated basis will have failed in print, and we will say so. Gordon's file, at this sourcing depth, is a primary result and $74. Endorse the sheriff with the mandate, unproven in the office, on watch for the hearing he promised.

For the complete Election 2026 breakdown — every race, claim by claim — see the full coverage on our website.

Vote early. Research your candidates. Choose the best moderates, whatever their party — no extremism from either side. And encourage your friends and family to do the same.


Sources

Election result — November 4, 2026

Result pending. No verified call (Associated Press or official) as of November 4, 2026. This page will be updated when the race is called or certified. The original article above is unchanged.

AI-assisted article — but the sources are human, and the facts are very real.

← Back to the Election Series