← Election Series · All statewide races

Our verdict

LiberalMind endorses Manuel Rivera — as unproven in elected office, and on watch

Election Day is November 3. Brian Schwalb, the District's second elected attorney general, seeks a second term after winning his June primary with 90.6% of the vote. Manuel Rivera, an immigration lawyer who calls himself "one of the most unconventional Republicans you will meet," is the District's first Republican AG nominee with a ballot line to defend. The structural fact of this race is printed where it belongs — in the primary returns themselves: 127,895 Democrats voted in June; 2,745 Republicans did. LiberalMind endorses Manuel Rivera — as unproven, and on watch. Read the research, and see why.

How the District got here

The District of Columbia has elected its attorney general only since 2014; Schwalb, sworn in January 2023, is the second person to hold the office by election (State AG Report). The office prosecutes juvenile cases and adult misdemeanors, brings the District's civil and consumer-protection suits, and defends D.C. law in court — in a city whose government exists at Congress's pleasure, which makes the AG's fights with the federal government a recurring part of the job description.

The primaries were held June 16, 2026 (District of Columbia Board of Elections, via the compiled election summary). Schwalb won the Democratic primary 115,909 (90.63%) to ANC member J.P. Szymkowicz's 11,381 (8.90%). Rivera won the Republican primary 2,530 (92.17%) against write-ins. The Statehood Green primary for this office was write-in only, and no Statehood Green candidate appears on the general ballot. The general-election roster — Schwalb (Democratic) and Rivera (Republican) — is the Board of Elections' candidate list as reproduced in local ballot guides (The Feedsack's BOE-based explainer; Washington Sun general-election guide; FOX 5 DC). No public poll and no campaign-finance comparison for this race was located in this research; we print neither rather than invent either.

Brian Schwalb (Democratic) — the incumbent

Background and service: Before his 2022 election, Schwalb was partner-in-charge of Venable LLP's D.C. office and previously the firm's vice chairman; early in his career he was a Justice Department Honors Program trial lawyer in the Tax Division (State AG Report). He is a proven officeholder: one full term in this exact office.

His record in office, as documented: His signature act was suing the Trump administration — on September 4, 2025, his office filed District of Columbia v. Trump (D.D.C. No. 1:25-cv-03005) to end the National Guard's law-enforcement deployment in the District, arguing the president lacked authority to use the Guard for general policing without the city's consent (Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse case file; ASIS). A federal judge ruled the deployment unlawful in November 2025; the D.C. Circuit paused that order in December 2025, and the appeal was still live through 2026 (Best Lawyers analysis; Medill on the Hill, Oct. 2026). His consumer-protection docket, from his office's own releases: an $8.25 million settlement with Amazon over Prime delivery exclusions in Wards 7 and 8 (Oct. 1, 2026); a $1 million resolution of the Snyder-era lawsuit against the Washington Commanders (Mar. 2, 2026); a junk-fee lawsuit against a large Ward 2 landlord (Apr. 27, 2026); and a suit against Athena Bitcoin over hidden fees and fraud risks (Sept. 2025).

The Manchin-test fact, stated plainly: No break by Schwalb with his party on Constitution, free-market, or freedom values was located in this research. His term's defining litigation runs the other direction — against a federal law-enforcement deployment ordered by a Republican president — which is his party's standard posture, executed competently.

Pros: A full term of operational command of this office, a consumer docket with real recoveries printed above, and a 90.6% primary win that shows his own electorate's verdict on his service. His National Guard suit won at the district court — whatever a reader thinks of its politics, it was not frivolous lawyering.

Cons: His office's juvenile prosecutions have drawn sustained criticism in a city where juvenile crime is a top voter concern — his challenger makes it a central campaign theme (Washingtonian). And his record is a party-standard Democratic record: on the values this publication prices, there is no exception case in it.

The flaw, plainly: None proven as misconduct. The pricing here is simpler: he is an able, mainstream Democrat whose term contains no documented break toward our values — the standing definition of an enabler — and his signature fight was to remove federal law-enforcement presence from the District's streets.

Manuel Rivera (Republican) — the unconventional challenger

Background and service: An immigration lawyer and a self-described former conservative Democrat. In the Washingtonian's profile of the District's Republican candidates (Aug. 2026): "I'm proudly one of the most unconventional Republicans you will meet," says Rivera; he "helped establish the DC law that entitles undocumented people to worker's compensation," and argues the AG's office could be more efficient, more transparent, and better on juvenile crime. He has never held elected office — nothing in the sources searched documents any prior public office. The LGBTQ-rights group GLAA rated him +4.5 in its 2026 ratings; Schwalb and Szymkowicz were not rated because they did not return the questionnaire (Washington Blade).

His program, as reported: Efficiency and cost-saving in the AG's office, transparency, and a harder line on juvenile crime (Washingtonian). Beyond that summary, no detailed platform document was located in this research — we print the thinness rather than fill it.

Pros: He is the in-tent candidate in a race where the incumbent offers no exception case, and his stated agenda — an office that runs efficiently, shows its work, and treats juvenile crime as a first-order problem — is aimed at the two complaints about the incumbent's term that voters actually voice. His legal career helping working people navigate the system, including people here illegally, is real client work, printed here at full size: readers who want an AG whose instincts run toward enforcement-first will not find that instinct in his signature cause, and we do not hide it.

Cons: He is unproven in any elected office, his published program is three themes rather than a plan, and his signature legal achievement — workers' compensation rights for undocumented workers — sits in open tension with the enforcement-first values of the party whose line he carries. He won his primary with 2,530 votes in a city that cast 115,909 for his opponent in the other primary; the electorate's structure is what it is, and we print it.

The flaw, plainly: No proven flaw in service — he has no service to price. Unproven is a watch posture, not a demerit; the endorsement below is made with the watch stated.

The minor candidates, briefly

There are none on the certified general ballot beyond the two above. A standing check found no pedophile-association material meeting the proven standard for either candidate — absence noted, nothing implied.

OUR CALL

LiberalMind endorses Manuel Rivera — as unproven in elected office, and on watch.

The doctrine's geometry is the whole story. Schwalb is a competent party-standard Democrat with no Manchin-test break in his file; that is the standing reason the exception is not earned, and his term's signature lawsuit — to end a federal law-enforcement deployment — is priced as his record, not as a scandal. Rivera is the Republican nominee, his agenda names the incumbent term's real weaknesses, and his file contains no proven flaw — only unprovenness and one honestly printed tension between his legal career and his party's instincts. In this publication's pricing, an unproven in-tent challenger with no proven flaw beats a proven enabler, and the watch is the price: if he wins, his juvenile-crime promises and his office's transparency are the first two things we check.

For the complete Election 2026 breakdown — every race, claim by claim — see the full coverage on our website.

Vote early. Research your candidates. Choose the best moderates, whatever their party — no extremism from either side. And encourage your friends and family to do the same.

Sources

Election result — November 4, 2026

Winner: Brian Schwalb (Democratic) — called by the Associated Press. This result was appended on November 4, 2026 (results wave 1); the original article above is unchanged, exactly as published before Election Day.

AI-assisted article — but the sources are human, and the facts are very real.

← Back to the Election Series