← Election Series · All statewide races

Our verdict

LiberalMind endorses Max Solomon — as unproven in elective office, and on watch

Election Day is November 3. No Republican filed petitions for treasurer at all — Max Solomon abandoned a long-shot run for governor, won the Republican nomination by write-in with more than 60,000 write-in votes, and now holds $4,917 against incumbent Michael Frerichs's nearly $1.6 million, on the State Board of Elections figures reported October 1. Frerichs, in office since January 2015, seeks a fourth term that would make him the longest-serving treasurer in state history, on investment figures that are his office's claims relayed by reporters, not independently audited in the research. Solomon, asked, did not identify a specific Frerichs investment he considers political — and told reporters, about international holdings, "I don't care what the returns will be on the bond… Illinois first." That sentence, in a chief investment officer's race, is priced in full below. It does not change the party test. LiberalMind endorses Max Solomon — as unproven in elective office, and on watch. Read the research, and see why.

How Illinois got here

Four-year term; the treasurer is the state's chief investment officer. Frerichs, first elected in 2014, was unopposed in the Democratic primary. No Republican filed petitions for the primary ballot. Solomon shifted from a gubernatorial campaign and won the nomination by write-in, receiving more than 60,000 write-in votes in March to qualify for November (Capitol News Illinois, Oct. 23, 2026; Focal News).

Two printed candidates, confirmed by two independent county-ballot compilations (Lansing Journal ballot guide, Oct. 7, 2026; Rockford Register Star Winnebago County ballot, Oct. 2, 2026) and the Illinois GOP's candidate page: Michael W. Frerichs (D, incumbent) and Max Solomon (R). No third-party or independent candidate appears in this race in any source consulted.

Competitiveness: No rating or poll was located. Capitol News Illinois reports Solomon "hasn't run a particularly visible campaign" against an incumbent seeking a record tenure — reporting characterization, printed as such.

The money — State Board of Elections figures via Capitol News Illinois (Oct. 23, 2026): Frerichs held nearly $1.6 million in his campaign account on Oct. 1, 2026. Solomon held $4,917 on Oct. 1, 2026. No conflicting compilation was located. The gap is roughly 325-to-1 on those two named figures, printed with their common date, never averaged with anything else.

Michael Frerichs (Democratic, incumbent) — proven in office, on figures his office supplies

Background and service: Treasurer since January 2015; won his first race in 2014 by fewer than 10,000 votes (Capitol News Illinois, Oct. 23, 2026).

The record claims, at the strength the research labels them: Investment-portfolio earnings grew to more than $1.4 billion in fiscal 2026; over $5.6 billion in investment returns across his tenure; record I-Cash unclaimed-property returns, with his office returning "about a million dollars" a day in unclaimed property, in his words; and the Bright Start college-savings program went from underperforming to a top Morningstar rating (Capitol News Illinois; Focal News; Daily Illini candidate guide, Oct. 22, 2026). Attribution matters: those earnings figures are the incumbent's claims relayed by reporters — not independently audited in the research — and they are printed as attributed claims, not as established fact. Under endorsement diligence, a signature performance claim that has not been independently verified earns credit at claim strength, no more.

His investment position, documented: He defends continued investment in Israeli companies and government bonds on return, safety, and diversification grounds, and calls divestment a legislative question (Capitol News Illinois; Focal News). That is a returns-first defense of the existing portfolio — stated plainly, it is the strongest substantive line in his file.

The Manchin-test fact, stated plainly: No in-service break with the Democratic Party on our values is sourced in the research. Twelve years of competent party-line incumbency, if the attributed figures hold, is not the exception test.

Pros: Proven in the office for nearly twelve years. Attributed return and unclaimed-property figures that, if verified, describe a well-run investment office. A returns-and-diversification rationale for his portfolio, stated on the record.

Cons: His signature performance numbers are office-supplied and unaudited in this research. He is a Democrat seeking a record fourth term with no sourced party break. His opponent's money and visibility make this the least contested statewide race on the ballot — incumbency here has not been stress-tested this cycle.

The flaw, plainly: For the endorsement question, enabler-class party-line service with no Manchin-test break — plus signature claims printed at claim strength because no independent audit was located. No personal-conduct flaw was sourced against him.

Max Solomon (Republican) — unproven in elective office, nominated by 60,000 people who wrote his name in

Background: South-suburban attorney and professor; shifted from a gubernatorial campaign to the treasurer write-in (Capitol News Illinois, Oct. 23, 2026). Unproven in elective office — stated, not held against him under our doctrine. The write-in itself is a documented fact worth its weight: more than 60,000 voters wrote his name in to put him on this ballot when no Republican had filed.

His stated positions: Illinois-focused investment, an online financial dashboard, and opposition to "politically motivated" investment decisions (Focal News; Capitol News Illinois).

The two documented gaps in his own case: First, he did not identify a specific Frerichs investment he considers political when asked (Focal News). Second, regarding international holdings, he told Capitol News Illinois: "I don't care what the returns will be on the bond… Illinois first." For most offices that would be a slogan. For the state's chief investment officer — whose constitutional job is the return and safety of public money — stated indifference to returns on a class of holdings is an own-position flaw, printed in his own words and priced as such. It is the heaviest single item in his file, and it is why this endorsement carries its watch language with emphasis.

Pros: A Republican in-tent on the values this publication supports. A transparency proposal — a public online financial dashboard — that is concrete and checkable. A write-in nomination that required real voters doing real work, not a filing fee.

Cons: Unproven in any elective office. $4,917 against nearly $1.6 million, and a campaign state reporting calls not particularly visible. He has not named the specific "political" investment his central critique depends on. His Illinois-first line, as quoted, subordinates returns in the one office where returns are the job.

The flaw, plainly: His own stated investment philosophy, in his own words — indifference to bond returns in a fiduciary office — plus an unspecified central critique. No personal-conduct flaw was sourced against him. Unproven status is not his flaw; it is stated in the endorsement itself, below.

The minor candidates, briefly

None. No third-party or independent candidate appears in this race in any source consulted. A standing check found no pedophile-association material meeting the proven standard — knowing association with or defense of a convicted pedophile — for any candidate on this ballot in the research; absence noted, nothing implied.

OUR CALL

LiberalMind endorses Max Solomon — as unproven in elective office, and on watch.

We do not soften this one. Frerichs may well be a competent treasurer — his figures say so, at claim strength, unaudited in this research — and competence in party-line Democratic service does not earn our exception without a proven break with his party, and none is sourced. Solomon's flaws are real and printed above at full weight: a critique he has not specified and a returns quote no fiduciary candidate should have said. They are, in species, an unspecified critique and a stated philosophy we are flagging on day one — not proven misconduct in service, because he has not served. Under our doctrine an unproven Republican with named flaws and a watch flag beats a proven incumbent who fails the exception test. If he wins, the watch starts with that quote: the dashboard he promised will show, in public, whether Illinois money earned what it should have earned — including on the bonds he said he did not care about.

For the complete Election 2026 breakdown — every race, claim by claim — see the full coverage on our website.

Vote early. Research your candidates. Choose the best moderates, whatever their party — no extremism from either side. And encourage your friends and family to do the same.

Sources

Election result — November 4, 2026

Winner: Michael Frerichs (Democratic) — called by the Associated Press. This result was appended on November 4, 2026 (results wave 1); the original article above is unchanged, exactly as published before Election Day.

AI-assisted article — but the sources are human, and the facts are very real.

← Back to the Election Series