← Election Series · All statewide races

Our verdict

LiberalMind endorses Scott Jensen — as unproven in audit office, and on watch

Election Day is November 3. State Auditor Julie Blaha is retiring, the seat is open, and the last person to win it — Blaha herself, in 2022 — won by 8,435 votes. Democrats have held this office since 2007. The three-way field is the strangest professional lineup in Minnesota's statewide coverage: Zack Filipovich, a Democrat who is an actual accountant and a former Duluth city councilor; Scott Jensen, a Republican family physician and former state senator who was his party's nominee for governor four years ago, whose claim to audit experience is self-reported and unverified, and whose pandemic statements drew eighteen medical-board complaints that were all dismissed without discipline; and Jay Reeves, a retired Army major running on designing every new program with the auditor inside it from day one. The polling flipped between September and October, and Jensen out-raises the field roughly five-to-one on the one compilation located. LiberalMind endorses Scott Jensen — as unproven in audit office, and on watch. Read the research, and see why — including the fact that makes this the closest call in this state's file.

How Minnesota got here

Incumbent Julie Blaha (DFL), auditor since 2019, announced in September 2025 that she will not seek re-election and is retiring from public office. The auditor oversees and audits local-government finances statewide and performs the annual single audit of federal programs. This is the first Minnesota auditor election in 36 years with no female major-party candidate.

On the Democratic side, Filipovich won the DFL nomination; Adam Jennings and State Rep. Dan Wolgamott exited at or after the DFL convention process — one source lists them as "eliminated at convention" and another lists them as "withdrew," a mechanism conflict in the sources that we note rather than resolve. Fergus Falls Mayor Ben Schierer withdrew to run for lieutenant governor. On the Republican side, Jensen first announced for governor on July 17, 2025, then dropped out on February 9, 2026 to run for auditor.

Three candidates, confirmed against an official Minnesota sample ballot (House District 45B) and corroborated by Ballotpedia News and the race's reference pages: Zack Filipovich (Democratic-Farmer-Labor) — spelled "Zack" on the ballot, which controls over coverage that uses "Zach"; Scott Jensen (Republican); and Jay Reeves (Forward Independence).

Polling — three public polls, all KSTP/SurveyUSA, printed as a sequence, never averaged: the mid-October poll shows Filipovich +1; the mid-September poll showed Jensen +7; both sit inside or near the surveys' credibility interval. A fourth reading circulating through a candidate-shared poll quoted in a partisan blog rests on an unnamed underlying survey and is not printed here — we note its existence and its status, and rely on the KSTP sequence. No formal race rating was located.

The money, from the one named compilation located: Transparency USA (Minnesota Campaign Finance Board data), 2026 cycle — Filipovich, contributions $159,016, expenditures $96,286; Jensen, contributions $842,440, loans of $10,000, expenditures $522,573; Reeves, contributions $14,878, expenditures $13,003. That table carries no as-of date; we treat it as the latest posted cycle totals as of the October 25, 2026 crawl, flagged for re-pull. On it, Jensen's money lead is roughly five-to-one over Filipovich.

Zack Filipovich (DFL) — the accountant in the race

Background and service: An accountant by profession, and a former Duluth City Councilor (2014–2022). He campaigns on internal controls to prevent fraud before it scales, and on transparency in the use of public dollars. He is endorsed by AFSCME Council 5 and labor. He has never held statewide office — relevant professional record, unproven statewide.

Pros: The only candidate in the field whose day job is the office's discipline: accounting, practiced professionally, plus eight years on a city council dealing with municipal budgets — the exact governments this auditor oversees. A platform stated in the auditor's own vocabulary: controls first, transparency throughout.

Cons: Unproven statewide, and unproven in any audit-executive role — a council seat and a practice are preparation, not a record of running audits. No break with his party was located in this record; his endorsements are his party's labor coalition, and his platform, professionally sound as it is, carries no Manchin-test evidence — no in-service break with the DFL on our values to inspect.

The flaw, plainly: Unproven at the scale of the office — a watch-closely posture — compounded, for endorsement purposes only, by the absence of any located exception evidence: he is his party's nominee running his party's standard race, with the strongest professional résumé in the field. That combination is exactly what makes this call close, and we do not hide it.

Scott Jensen (Republican) — a proven politician running for an accountant's office

Background and service: A family physician (M.D., University of Minnesota, 1981). Minnesota state senator for District 47 (2017–2021), where coverage gives him a moderate reputation in the Senate followed by a documented later shift right. In 2022 he was the Republican nominee for governor, losing to Governor Walz 52.3%–44.6% — proven as a legislator and as a statewide nominee who has faced the whole electorate.

The COVID record — the documented sequence, printed precisely: From 2020 to mid-2022, the Minnesota Board of Medical Practice received 18 complaints about Jensen's pandemic statements — questioning COVID case counts and related claims, which critics called misinformation. The board opened four investigations, held one conference, and dismissed all complaints without a contested hearing or corrective action. Jensen sued, alleging the investigations chilled his speech; the federal district court dismissed for lack of standing; on September 15–17, 2026, the 8th Circuit revived the suit on standing grounds only, expressly not reaching the merits. The accurate sentence is: investigated, never disciplined; litigation live on standing, not merits. Anyone who tells you he was disciplined is misstating the record; anyone who tells you a court vindicated his statements is misstating it the other way.

His auditor pitch and his signature credential — one stated, one unverified: His pitch is immediate anti-fraud action, random unannounced audits, and holding agencies and businesses accountable. He also claims audit-relevant service: Audit Chair for a $1 billion financial institution for over a decade, plus multiple board roles. That claim comes from his own answers to a voter-guide questionnaire. It is self-reported and unverified in this research — the signature credential of his candidacy for an audit office does not close on independent sourcing, and under endorsement diligence we price it exactly that way: as an unclosed claim, attached to the man proposing himself on it.

Pros: Proven in elected office and in a statewide general election — the only candidate here who has been voted on by the whole state, in a race he lost respectably rather than catastrophically. A fraud-first auditor's pitch stated in operational terms (random, unannounced). A money lead of roughly five-to-one, which in a low-salience down-ballot race is a real organizational asset. And on the heaviest charge environment in his file — eighteen complaints, four investigations — the regulator's final act was dismissal without discipline.

Cons: He is a physician and politician asking for the state's audit office, and his one audit-specific credential is unverified self-report. He announced for governor first and arrived at this race in February as a second choice — the office is his fallback, on his own timeline. His Senate-era moderate reputation and his later documented shift right sit unresolved in the same file.

The flaw, plainly: An unclosed signature claim — the audit-chair credential on which his fitness for this specific office rests is self-reported and unverified — plus a candidacy that began as a governor's race. The COVID complaints are priced at their documented disposition: investigated, never disciplined, and nothing more.

Jay Reeves (Forward Independence) — the systems candidate, on self-report

Background, as sourced: A retired U.S. Army Major, data analyst, and executive-level manager of budgets and complex systems — all from his own voter-guide questionnaire answers, self-reported, with no independent verification of the service record located in this research. His first proposed act is distinctive: legislation requiring every new taxpayer-funded program to be designed with the auditor's office involved from the start — audit built into program design rather than bolted on after money moves.

Pros: The most structurally interesting idea in the race: prevention by design, which is also, in different words, his Democratic opponent's controls-first pitch arrived at from a military-systems direction. A career profile — budgets, complex systems, data — that, if his self-report holds, fits the office's oversight work.

Cons: Everything material about him is self-reported and unverified in this research, his fundraising is nominal ($14,878 on the compilation located), and no public record of office exists to inspect. Unproven, on a third-party line, without the organizational base to be watched from anywhere but third place in the polls that exist.

The flaw, plainly: Unproven and unverified — the record is a questionnaire. Under our doctrine unproven alone never disqualifies; unproven plus unverifiable plus no path shown in any sourced poll leaves nothing for an endorsement to rest on.

OUR CALL

LiberalMind endorses Scott Jensen — as unproven in audit office, and on watch.

This is the closest call in Minnesota's statewide file, and the piece prices both sides honestly. For Filipovich: he is the only accountant in an auditor's race, his council service touched the exact governments this office audits, and nothing sourced against him rises above unproven-at-scale. Against an endorsement: he is a party-line DFL nominee with labor-coalition endorsements and no located break with his party in service — the Manchin test looks for proven breaks on our values, and there is nothing in his file to inspect, while the office he seeks has been held by his party since 2007 through a tenure that ends in retirement after a 2022 squeaker, not in distinction any source here documents. For Jensen: he is proven where Filipovich is not — legislator, statewide nominee, fraud-first pitch — and the worst-documented matter in his file closed in his favor, dismissed without discipline by the board itself. Against an endorsement, and priced in full above: his audit credential is an unclosed self-report, and this race was his second choice. Weigh an unclosed signature claim and a fallback candidacy against an unproven party-line candidacy with the better résumé, and the proven-versus-unproven rule decides it as it decided the attorney general race in this state: a Democrat without exception evidence does not take an office from a proven in-tent Republican whose proven flaws are an unverified credential and a dismissed complaint file. Endorse Jensen — as unproven in audit office specifically, and on watch, with his audit-chair claim flagged here as the first thing his tenure must document or drop.

For the complete Election 2026 breakdown — every race, claim by claim — see the full coverage on our website.

Vote early. Research your candidates. Choose the best moderates, whatever their party — no extremism from either side. And encourage your friends and family to do the same.

Sources

Election result — November 4, 2026

Result pending. No verified call (Associated Press or official) as of November 4, 2026. This page will be updated when the race is called or certified. The original article above is unchanged.

AI-assisted article — but the sources are human, and the facts are very real.

← Back to the Election Series