← Election Series · All statewide races

Our verdict

LiberalMind endorses Brian Kroshus

Election Day is November 3. Brian Kroshus, appointed tax commissioner in late 2021 after serving on the Public Service Commission and then elected to this office in 2022, seeks another term. Mark Nelson, a retired farmer from near Rugby described in primary coverage as a perennial candidate, filled the last open Democratic-NPL slot before the filing deadline. His record beyond that is thin, and this article prints the thinness instead of padding it. Research located no campaign-finance totals and no polling for this race, and this article prints none. LiberalMind endorses Brian Kroshus. Read the research, and see why.

How North Dakota got here

North Dakota elects its statewide executives on staggered cycles. The primaries were held June 9, 2026, and both nominees won theirs. The roster is confirmed by the North Dakota Living voter guide and primary reporting: Brian Kroshus (Republican), incumbent, and Mark Nelson (Democratic-NPL).

Offices not on the 2026 ballot, for context: Governor, State Treasurer, State Auditor, and Insurance Commissioner were all elected in 2024 and are next up in 2028.

The money and the competitiveness evidence, stated plainly: research located no campaign-finance totals and no polling or ratings for any North Dakota statewide race in this set, including this one. No money figures and no competitiveness evidence are printed, because none were located. This is a short article because the sourced record is short. Shorter is correct here; we do not pad.

Brian Kroshus (Republican) — the proven incumbent

Background and service: Appointed Tax Commissioner in December 2021, beginning January 4, 2022, after serving on the Public Service Commission — he had been re-elected to a six-year PSC term in 2020. He was then elected Tax Commissioner in 2022. This research did not pull the opponent or margin for that 2022 election, and none is printed. No scandal or verification failure was located for Kroshus in this research.

Pros: Proven in state regulatory service across two offices — a full elected PSC tenure, appointment to this office, and then election to it in his own right in 2022. He is the incumbent in the office on the ballot, with a record voters have already ratified once.

Cons: On this record the cons are thin in the same way the file is thin: the research pulled for this race locates his service history but no detailed tax-policy record for this cycle to inspect, and we do not invent one.

The flaw, plainly: None proven in service on this record.

Mark Nelson (Democratic-NPL) — the perennial candidate, thin record

Background and service: A retired farmer who lives near Rugby. He was a late addition who filled the last open Democratic-NPL slot before the filing deadline, and primary coverage describes him as a "perennial candidate." That is the record located for this race: beyond retired farmer, Rugby, perennial candidate, and the late slot-filling nomination, no further record was located in this research — no office held, no documented position, no service file to inspect. The thinness is printed as thinness.

The Manchin-test fact, stated plainly: No in-service break by Nelson with his party on Constitution, free-market, or freedom values was located — there is no in-service record in this file in which one could appear.

Pros: A retired farmer willing to fill a ballot slot his party needed filled, giving voters a contested race for an office that would otherwise go unopposed. That willingness is the located positive, and it is printed at that strength.

Cons: A perennial candidacy with no located record in office, no located documented positions, and a nomination that arrived as a late slot-filling addition. There is, on this research, almost nothing for a voter — or for us — to inspect.

The flaw, plainly: No proven flaw in service was located, because no service record was located. The disqualifying fact under our doctrine is not a flaw — it is an absence: no proven record and no Manchin-test exception case exists to set against a proven incumbent. Nelson is not priced as an extremist; nothing in this file supports any strong word about him at all.

The minor candidates, briefly

There are none on the rosters consulted for this office. A standing check found no pedophile-association material meeting the proven standard for either candidate — absence noted, nothing implied.

OUR CALL

LiberalMind endorses Brian Kroshus.

Kroshus is proven — elected to the Public Service Commission, appointed to this office, then elected to it in 2022 — with no scandal or verification failure located. Nelson's file is honestly thin: a retired farmer, a perennial candidate, a late slot-filling nomination, and no located record in office or documented positions to inspect. A voter cannot verify what is not there, and neither can we. Endorse the proven in-service conservative.

For the complete Election 2026 breakdown — every race, claim by claim — see the full coverage on our website.

Vote early. Research your candidates. Choose the best moderates, whatever their party — no extremism from either side. And encourage your friends and family to do the same.

Sources

Election result — November 4, 2026

Result pending. No verified call (Associated Press or official) as of November 4, 2026. This page will be updated when the race is called or certified. The original article above is unchanged.

AI-assisted article — but the sources are human, and the facts are very real.

← Back to the Election Series