← Election Series · All statewide races

Our verdict

LiberalMind endorses Jay Schroeder — as unproven in office, and on watch

Election Day is November 3. Wisconsin's secretary of state does not oversee elections — the bipartisan Wisconsin Elections Commission does — and this open-seat race is really an argument about whether that should change. Republican Jay Schroeder, a self-described "authentic MAGA activist" who beat his own party convention's unanimous choice, wants to dismantle the Commission and move election authority into this office. Democrat JoCasta Zamarripa wants election authority to stay where it is. Green Pete Karas, who outraised the Republican, completes the ballot. LiberalMind endorses Jay Schroeder — as unproven in office, and on watch. Read the research, and see why.

How Wisconsin got here

The seat is open because incumbent Sarah Godlewski (D) is running for lieutenant governor. Ballotpedia News (Sept. 16, 2026) calls it "the first [election] in 40 years without an incumbent on the ballot"; the 2026 Wisconsin elections summary calls it "the first open seat secretary of state election in Wisconsin since 1978." Both describe the same open seat; the framings differ in baseline and we print the conflict without reconciling it. Zamarripa was unopposed in the Democratic primary. Schroeder won a four-way Republican primary over Nate Pollnow, Cindy Werner, and Brayden Myer — an upset: the Republican State Convention had unanimously endorsed Pollnow (Ballotpedia News; 2026 Wisconsin elections summary). Karas (Green) is confirmed by Ballotpedia News and the Post-Crescent voter guide.

The office's actual power, because the race turns on it: Wisconsin is one of 13 states where the secretary of state does not oversee elections; the office is now primarily the state's clerk and record-keeper, its powers drawn down beginning with the 1974 election-board changes and later under Gov. Scott Walker (Ballotpedia News, Sept. 16; Badger Herald). The dispute is therefore whether to move election administration into an office that does not currently hold it.

The money (Transparency USA compilation of Wisconsin filings, cumulative as displayed Oct. 2026 — the compilation's boundaries, printed as such): Zamarripa contributions $79,564.61; Karas $61,159.29; Schroeder $10,800.00 — the Republican nominee raised the least of the three general-election candidates, and the primary loser Pollnow ($130,096.13) outraised him. Competitiveness: Sabato's Crystal Ball (Louis Jacobson, September 2026) shifted the race from Toss-up to "Leans Democratic" — "Democrats have a small edge here" (via Ballotpedia News). The WisPredict model (accessed Oct. 25) gives Zamarripa an 84.2% win probability, "Likely D" — a single forecast model, labeled as such. We print both; they point the same way, and neither is our call.

JoCasta Zamarripa (Democratic)

Background and service: Milwaukee Common Council member since 2020; previously 10 years in the State Assembly for District 8 in Milwaukee (Ballotpedia News, Oct. 21; Badger Herald). Her position: election authority should remain with the bipartisan Wisconsin Elections Commission (Ballotpedia News, Sept. 16). First-time statewide candidate — unproven at statewide level, proven in city and legislative service.

The Manchin test: No break with her party toward our values in service was located in this research; her stated position defends the existing commission structure her party's incumbent administration supports.

Pros: A decade in the Assembly and six years on the Common Council; the fundraising lead over the Republican; Sabato and the model both lean her way.

Cons: No Manchin-test break located. Her program for this office is the status quo.

The flaw, plainly: Alignment — a proven Democratic officeholder running to keep things as they are, with no documented break toward our values.

Jay Schroeder (Republican)

Background and service: A businessman, real-estate and stock-market investor from Clintonville (Ballotpedia News, Oct. 21). The 2018 Republican nominee for this office, losing to Doug La Follette by ~155,000 votes; he had advanced in only one of four prior election attempts (Badger Herald). Self-described "authentic MAGA activist" (Bolts). His central promise: dismantle the Wisconsin Elections Commission and move the chief-election-official role back to the Secretary of State — "The current system is an arbitrary disaster that lacks the transparency Wisconsinites deserve" (Ballotpedia News, Sept. 16).

Pricing the program, plainly: A structural proposal to relocate election administration is a policy program, stated openly and debatable on its merits. On the located record it is not a personal-program extremist classification — the word "extremist" stays reserved for that tier, and Schroeder's self-description and single-issue program do not place him in it on this file. What the file does show: his own party's convention unanimously chose someone else, primary voters chose him anyway, and he has raised $10,800 against a Green who raised $61,159.

Status under our standard: Never held office — unproven, on watch.

Pros: The Republican nominee, chosen by primary voters over the convention's unanimous pick, running on a stated, specific program for the office.

Cons: A 155,000-vote loss in his one prior run for this office; the least money of the three candidates on the ballot; a signature promise that would restructure how Wisconsin runs elections, offered by a candidate with no administrative record to price it against.

The flaw, plainly: Not a conduct flaw — an unproven candidacy carrying an outsized structural promise. The promise is printed in his own words; voters can weigh it exactly as stated.

Pete Karas (Green)

Karas is on the general-election ballot (Ballotpedia News; Post-Crescent voter guide) and raised $61,159.29 per the Transparency USA compilation. No detailed record for Karas was located in this research — a named gap, not an implied negative. His fundraising exceeding the Republican nominee's is a documented fact of this race's money table and is printed there.

OUR CALL

LiberalMind endorses Jay Schroeder — as unproven in office, and on watch.

Zamarripa is a proven Democratic officeholder defending the status quo, with no Manchin-test break located. Schroeder is an unproven Republican with a specific, openly stated structural program, a prior landslide loss, and the smallest war chest on the ballot. Our doctrine does not require the Republican to be impressive; it requires the Democrat to have earned an exception, and on this record she has not. Endorse Schroeder, on watch — and flag, as we do in our report, that his dismantle-the-Commission promise and his own convention's unanimous rejection of him make this a borderline the owner should see with both facts attached.

For the complete Election 2026 breakdown — every race, claim by claim — see the full coverage on our website.

Vote early. Research your candidates. Choose the best moderates, whatever their party — no extremism from either side. And encourage your friends and family to do the same.

Sources

Election result — November 5, 2026

Winner: JoCasta Zamarripa (Democratic) — called by the Associated Press. This result was appended on November 5, 2026 (results wave 3); the original article above is unchanged, exactly as published before Election Day.

AI-assisted article — but the sources are human, and the facts are very real.

← Back to the Election Series